What Do Google and Uber Want From Their Lawyers in 2018?
In-house lawyers from two tech juggernauts share their outside counsel wish lists.
December 18, 2017 at 05:52 PM
3 minute read
What do clients want from their outside law firms next year? In a nutshell: They want you to work hard and smart. And more fairly too.
Angela Padilla, vice president and deputy general counsel of litigation and employment at Uber Technologies Inc., and Catherine Lacavera, director of IP and litigation at Google, each shared the top items on their outside counsel wish lists for 2018.
Angela Padilla, Uber
• Better billing. “Outside law firms [need to] present clients with fair and reasonable bills that reflect an investment in their clients and eliminate ever-increasing billable hour rates. It's absurd to be paying over $1,000 an hour for lawyers. It cannot be rates times hours any more. We are just maxing out the amount we can pay even the most seasoned partners. All of the old things—flat fees, caps and collars—are not suitable for high-risk litigation. We have to come up with a way to bill for super-premium high risk.”
• Diversity and inclusion. “It's an old saw, so we need to do something really revolutionary on this front. It's still not happening at the rate we want it to happen. That I still have all-white teams coming to pitch for me is stunning … Outside firms showing they have diverse teams is key.”
• Better conflict management. “Law firms need to be more sensitive to conflicts. It's harder and harder because law firms are getting larger and larger and business conflicts are getting ever harder to manage. I'm not sure what is the answer, but loyalty to the client is eroding.”
• Share your lawyers. “We've had a lot [of] associates seconded and they are great. It's a great way to really invest in the business.”
• More sensitivity on costs. “Outside firms generally don't follow the outside billing guidelines. They need to think about our return on investment and frankly justify their value.”
Catherine Lacavera, Google
• Embrace technology. “The legal industry is ripe for disruption. Technologies like machine learning can ease the burden of manual tasks like document review. Lawyers should lead adoption of and benefit from technological advances to the profession.”
• Foster diversity. “Some law firms have made great progress on diversity, but many firms still have a long way to go, particularly at more senior levels. We have a very diverse in-house team and we are promoting diversity in our hiring practices. We have developed mentorship programs for diverse law firm associates to foster a diverse pipeline for more senior roles.”
• Streamline discovery. “As electronic data proliferates, so too does the ever-growing burden of discovery. Other countries' legal systems function with lower costs and greater speed because they have minimal or no discovery, and instead focus on requiring, and enforcing voluntary disclosures. Fee shifting is also more prevalent elsewhere and could be used to help curb unreasonable discovery requests.”
• Harmonize attorney licensing. “Examinations and requirements could be more standardized to reduce barriers to relocation.”
• Protect confidentiality. ”Litigation should not threaten trade secrets and confidential information. Protective order breaches should have serious consequences. Concerns over loss of trade secret and confidentiality should not prevent litigants from pursuing litigation on the merits or force unwarranted settlements.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy U.S. Big Law Was Mostly Sidelined in Asian IPOs in New York Last Year
Greenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readChange Is Coming With the New Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250