An Army Behind Them: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Finalist for Litigation Department of the Year
Behind the roster of all-stars in Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's litigation department is a deep bench of litigators that can handle any case thrown at them, earning the group a finalist spot in our Litigation Department of the Year contest.
December 19, 2017 at 06:55 AM
5 minute read
Losing a $500 million jury verdict sounds like a general counsel's worst nightmare. That's what happened to Facebook Inc. last February, when federal jurors in Dallas found that Facebook's Oculus unit had relied on another company's intellectual property to launch its Rift virtual reality headset.
So why does Facebook's GC, Colin Stretch, sound so calm talking about the case now? It might have something to do with the law firm he tapped to challenge the verdict: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.
"We've relied on them for bare-knuckle litigation, for appellate work, for Supreme Court work, for regulatory work, for class action defense, you name it," Stretch says. He cites the firm's deep bench of first-chair talent, including partner James Ho in Dallas, who is leading the team in the Oculus case. But he says it's not just the superstars that keep him coming back.
"They obviously have an all-star roster," Stretch says. "But you also know that behind them is an army."
Department Size and Revenue: Partners: 197 Associates: 515 Other: 35 Department as Percentage of Firm: 58.3%; Percentage of Firm Revenue, 2016: 56.3%
Army is right. Sure, there are renowned litigators like Theodore Olson, Miguel Estrada, Debra Wong Yang, Joseph Warin, Theodore Boutrous Jr. and Randy Mastro. But they are just a handful of Gibson Dunn's nearly 200 litigation partners, out of more than 700 litigators in all. The firm was The American Lawyer's Litigation Department of the Year winner three times over the last decade, and a finalist every round. And in the time period covered here, Gibson Dunn's army kept on overpowering, outmaneuvering, and plain old clobbering its opponents in court.
The victories sometimes develop a momentum all their own, with Gibson Dunn lawyers relying on a precedent-setting win for one client to aid another. When partner Mark Perry persuaded the Federal Circuit to toss a $530 million patent verdict against client Apple Inc. in March 2017, the court cited Perry's own 2014 U.S. Supreme Court win in Alice v. CLS Bank International, which is still helping U.S. IP defendants everywhere escape infringement claims related to abstract concepts.
Or take Boutrous, the firm's L.A.-based litigation co-chair, who has been at the forefront of class action litigation defense since he knocked out the country's largest-ever employee class action in 2011 in Wal-Mart v. Dukes. That experience made him an obvious choice for Uber Inc. in its ongoing battle to avoid a proposed class action involving nearly 400,000 drivers. In September 2016, Boutrous convinced the Ninth Circuit that Uber's arbitration agreements with its drivers were enforceable, tilting the scales heavily in favor of the defense.
Not all the firm's big wins involved appeals. Gibson Dunn also scored plenty of trial wins, most notably in a long-fought case on behalf of Hewlett-Packard Enterprise that culminated in a staggering $3 billion jury verdict against Oracle Corp. in July 2016.
For five years, including a bench trial and an interlocutory appeal, a team led by Gibson Dunn partner Jeffrey Thomas argued that Oracle breached an agreement to keep offering new versions of its software to customers using HP's high-end Integrity servers. Thomas and other lawyers had already convinced a judge in 2012 that there was an agreement, but to win over a jury he needed to show that Oracle was to blame for abruptly upending the companies' relationship.
The trial pitted Thomas against Boies Schiller Flexner's formidable William Isaacson, but it was Thomas whose narrative carried the day. Not only did a California jury award all $3.014 billion in damages that Thomas sought, but post-judgment interest is continuing to accrue—at a rate of nearly $1 million per day.
Though Thomas expects he'll likely wind up arguing for HP on appeal, he emphasizes that the litigation has been a team effort, and says the beauty of his firm is that there are so many exceptional lawyers who can give critical support at all stages of a case.
"We have stars, but not a star system," says Mastro, the firm's New York-based litigation co-chair. And, he points out, there is a robust pipeline of younger stars at the firm who are still in their 40s, including partners Matt McGill and Drew Tulumello, who delivered their first U.S. Supreme Court arguments in 2016 and 2017—and walked away with major wins for BNSF Railway and Puerto Rico bondholders.
John Schultz, HP's general counsel, says a combination of quality, depth and consistency is what sets Gibson Dunn apart. "Everyone talks about having great lawyers and being client-friendly, but with a lot of firms the output is actually pretty uneven," Schultz says. "Partner to partner, associate to associate, case to case, there's no firm we've worked with that is better than the Gibson folks."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDown to 150 Lawyers, Boies Schiller Posts Best RPL in a Decade
Boosting Head Count and Profitability, O'Melveny & Myers Became a $1 Billion Firm in 2022
One Year In, Quinn Emanuel Is the Quintessential Miami Big Law Transplant
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250