Jack of All Trades: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Finalist for Litigation Department of the Year
The litigation department is no longer just an offshoot of Skadden's corporate practice, but a powerhouse in its own right, landing it a spot as finalist for the Litigation Department of the Year.
December 19, 2017 at 06:55 AM
4 minute read
It's slightly difficult to characterize Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom's litigation practice—and that's a good thing. Showing versatility and a zest for trial work, in the past two years Skadden litigators notched a diverse range of victories in forums all over the United States and the world. Some of the largest companies in the world—and some not quite as large—turned to Skadden to handle matters of the highest priority to their business strategy, and sometimes their survival.
On behalf of ZeniMax Media, a team led by partners P. Anthony Sammi and Kurt Hemr fought Facebook Inc. over rights to virtual reality technology, and won a $500 million jury verdict with co-counsel Haynes and Boone. When Skadden partners Allen Ruby and Jack DiCanio and co-counsel Arguedas Cassman & Headley defended FedEx Corp. against criminal drug trafficking charges—for allegedly conspiring with pharmacies that shipped illegally prescribed medication—the government dropped the case in midtrial. Skadden litigators won a $1.2 billion arbitration award for Japan's NTT Docomo Inc. against India's Tata Sons Ltd.; helped Crédit Agricole CIB avoid a criminal plea in settling charges that the bank had violated U.S. sanctions against Sudan, Iran and Cuba; and got a rare reversal of FIFA's suspension of a soccer association official.
The time when the litigation group was essentially a support arm of the firm's blockbuster mergers and acquisitions practice is long gone. Still, financial litigation remains a strength. Skadden steered E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. through antitrust approvals in more than 20 jurisdictions worldwide in its merger with Dow Chemical Co. A team led by partner Jay Kasner and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton's Lewis Liman convinced the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to overturn class certification in a securities litigation suit against Cleary client Petrobras and Skadden's clients, the bond underwriters involved in the deal. And Skadden partners Robert Saunders and Jennifer Voss successfully defended Sprint Corp.'s buyout of Clearwire Corp. after a Clearwire shareholder, Aurelius Capital Management, claimed that Sprint's buyout offer undervalued Clearwire.
"It was a very complex case, and they developed a very deep understanding of the facts and really kept their eye on the ball," says Sprint vice president of legal Susan Haller of the Skadden lawyers' performance during a 10-day trial in Delaware's Court of Chancery. In a stinging defeat for Aurelius, the court held that its Clearwire shares were worth just $2.13 each—less than half of the per-share merger price.
"It was a great result," says Haller.
Marshaling a vast amount of highly technical evidence was also key to the ZeniMax win, says Sammi. ZeniMax sued Facebook, claiming that a former employee had taken proprietary virtual reality software to Oculus VR, later acquired by Facebook. Although the jury disregarded ZeniMax's trade secret claims, it found for ZeniMax on copyright and trademark infringement claims. "Our ability in-house to understand complicated things like source code gives us an edge," Sammi says.
Compared with some of its peer firms, Skadden puts less emphasis on appellate work as a separate practice. "One thing we pride ourselves on is doing our own appellate work," says securities litigation partner Scott Musoff, part of the Skadden-Cleary team that landed the Second Circuit win in the Petrobras case last July. In a department of more than 600 litigators, only about 20 spend most of their time on appellate matters.
Department Size and Revenue Partners: 121 Associates: 410 Other: 123
Department as Percentage of Firm: 32% Percentage of Firm Revenue, 2016: Would not disclose
But the firm's appellate victories had broad impact. At the U.S. Supreme Court, partner Clifford Sloan, representing Texas death row inmate Bobby James Moore pro bono, persuaded the justices to rule 9-0 to strike down Texas's standards for evaluating intellectual disabilities in death penalty cases. The Second Circuit's Petrobras ruling essentially erects a new hurdle to class certification in class actions involving nonexchange-traded securities: Before certifying a class, courts must determine on an individual basis whether the securities were purchased domestically.
"We took the argument that it was a global offering of [Petrobras] notes, not an offering on U.S. exchanges," Musoff says. "It was the first time that argument had been used on class certification."
Correction, 12/19/2012, 10:00 a.m.: In an earlier version of this article, Skadden partner Robert Saunders' name was misspelled. We regret the error.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn a Texas Growth Surge, Paul Hastings Signs New Leases in Houston, Dallas
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250