Reinventing Norms: Sullivan & Cromwell, Finalist for Litigation Department of the Year
No longer "your grandmother's" Sullivan & Cromwell, the firm is mixing things up, landing it a place as finalist for the Litigation Department of the Year.
December 19, 2017 at 06:55 AM
4 minute read
BlackBerry established its relationship with Sullivan & Cromwell for the first time when it hired the New York-based firm to litigate against Qualcomm. It is unlikely, however, to be the last time Canada-based BlackBerry taps Sullivan, given the outcome of that case.
In the dispute—over royalties paid for use of patented handheld device technology—a team led by partner Garrard Beeney won a binding arbitration award of $940 million for BlackBerry in April 2017.
Beyond welcoming the size of the award, BlackBerry's in-house department also embraced the advantage of the Sullivan team's efficiency and willing cooperation to develop a cost-conscious legal strategy for the company.
"I don't think I have ever worked with counsel that have worked as collaboratively on a litigation as big as this," says Edward McGah, BlackBerry's deputy general counsel and vice president. "They made it easy for us to be full partners in this endeavor. They were very efficient in everything and particularly in the staffing. They were expensive, but we were satisfied with the quality of work. If the award had gone the other way, we would still have thought we had the best representation we could have."
Despite the ebbing of financial crisis litigation, S&C has thrived, picking up some of the nation's highest-profile representations, in areas such as mass torts. S&C replaced other firms, worked cohesively with in-house law departments and won big at trial when its lawyers weren't negotiating Wall Street-pleasing settlements for clients. Much of this was done despite stiff odds and being pitted against teams for the government or private plaintiffs with far more lawyers.
"In a bet-the-company case, the lawyer's job is to land the plane safely, not to try a case for the sake of trying it. This is where the S&C generalist approach paid off; a large team of specialists never could have gotten the job done," says Robert Giuffra, the S&C partner who led in the negotiations to resolve the criminal and civil exposure for Volkswagen after the company admitted to altering 11 million diesel cars to evade environmental regulations. For VW, the Sullivan team replaced Kirkland & Ellis and Herzfeld & Rubin as the company's national coordinating counsel. Following the April 2016 announcement of the settlement, the company's stock rose 16 percent.
In the last two years, S&C negotiated a cost-saving settlement for BP plc, defending against claims related to the Deepwater Horizon spill. While BP initially tapped Kirkland & Ellis, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, and Arnold & Porter as lead counsel and S&C only to handle shareholder derivative and securities litigation (which was eventually dismissed), the company's board turned in April 2015 to S&C for its negotiations with the governments. In October 2015, after months of secret negotiations, the Department of Justice and five Gulf States unveiled an $18.7 billion agreement with a 15- to 18-year payment plan to settle BP civil liability for environmental and economic damages—BP's stock price rose 5 percent.
In the courtroom, S&C's wins went beyond the big payday for BlackBerry. The firm defeated a $2.4 billion claim against Argentina's central bank, reversing a lower court and preserving the institution's sovereign immunity. S&C lawyers also beat back allegations that Goldman Sachs sought to drive up the price of aluminum. Both wins came in the Second Circuit.
Once known largely as Wall Street's law firm of choice for deals and transactions, only handling litigation as a sideline, S&C has evolved in recent years. Litigation now accounts for nearly 40 percent of firm revenues.
Department Size and Revenue Partners: 52 Associates: 184 Other: 24
Department as Percentage of Firm: 34% Percentage of Firm Revenue, 2016: 35%
"This is no longer your grandmother's and grandfather's Sullivan & Cromwell," Giuffra says. For VW, BlackBerry and others, S&C partners make it a point to bring fewer but, they believe, more focused lawyers than their competitors do to solve the clients' problems.
"We are a group of 52 partners who work collaboratively," says executive committee member Sharon Nelles, referring to S&C's litigation department partner roster, which represents 30 percent of the firm's 173 partners.
Although Beeney was the only Sullivan partner on BlackBerry's team, McGah says he had no worries about being under-resourced.
He appreciated S&C offering the few and able. "I'm old enough to think that is the better way to do it. I was impressed by Sullivan & Cromwell," he says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Law Firms Get Hacked, Are Their Corporate Clients on the Hook?
Former Mayer Brown Counsel Alleges Disability Discrimination Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Duane Morris Uses Nonequity Partnership as 'Income Shifting' Device, Class Action Contends
5 minute readFTX Customers Double Down on Claims Against Sullivan & Cromwell
Trending Stories
- 1OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 2Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 3Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 4Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
- 5'Big Law Had Become Too Woke': Why Bill Barr Moved On
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250