In Age of Differentiation, How Marketing Teams Can Increase Market Share
Law firm marketing departments can help drive a firm's vision in an era where distinction is key, but partners have to be willing to hear their honest assessments. Here are three key tips for leveraging your marketing teams in 2018.
January 02, 2018 at 10:35 AM
6 minute read
Editor's Note: This is the first of a new, monthly column in The American Lawyer that will focus on legal marketing and how lawyers and marketers can better work together.
The end of one year and the beginning of another presents an opportunity to move forward with renewed purpose and direction. Staying ahead of the evolving legal landscape calls for adaptability and collaboration from every corner of your firm. A marketing and business development (M&BD) department is a prime area to invest in and leverage in an industry that is particularly hungry for competitive advantage. The modern capabilities of M&BD teams can distinguish your firm and drive realistic expectations for progress and growth in the years ahead.
While many firms have established M&BD functions, most are not maximizing the value of their investment in this resource. Firms who proactively integrate M&BD professionals into business operations will save precious time when inevitable changes in the marketplace emerge.
We all know that marketing is a complex concept and that a “one-size-fits-all” solution does not exist to measure success. However, when viewed on a more global scale, focusing on this work will transform the challenges of today into tomorrow's opportunities.
- Today's challenge: There is an epidemic of “specialness” plaguing law firms who feel that their individual offering is unique either because of their lawyers' breadth and depth of experience, their geographic footprint or a variety of other factors that are not actual differentiators. We regularly encounter firms with unrealistic perspectives of their status in a particular market because they have not taken a hard, realistic look at their firm's relative weaknesses in addition to their strengths.
Tomorrow's opportunity: Challenge your M&BD team to perform an honest assessment of your firm's market positioning and then prepare your partners to embrace and act upon that reality. One trend that may help you think differently is an industry vs. practice orientation. As a first step, take a deep dive into the top five industries that are critical to your firm's business, regardless of practice. Use that information to determine if the market is pointing to their economic longevity, where their hubs are located and if those are emerging or stagnant business markets. From there, you can determine where your bench strength is accordingly. When you cut the data this way, you may be surprised to find that you have unrealized strengths that could turn into legitimate differentiators.
- Today's challenge: It's risky to view active and undistracted thinking as a luxury. As a lawyer, you are captive to the billable hour, and anything that falls into the category of non-billable equates to “not profitable” and therefore less of a priority. As a result, M&BD activities, idea generation and research drop to the bottom of the list because the investment of time can't be quantified using the same metrics.
Tomorrow's opportunity: Empower your M&BD professionals to hold you accountable for “think sessions” where you work through what you are trying to achieve, and to arm you with the tools you need in your arsenal to recognize success. New technologies provide unprecedented access to information about clients and markets, and possess growing power to target and focus programs against those markets. According to a recent study published by Calibrate Legal, the average large law firm marketing department has 17 pieces of marketing technology. How can you best leverage these resources to reach your objectives? Your M&BD team should have a keen eye on how your plans contribute to the firm's overall bottom line, be armed with best practices for bringing your ideas to fruition, and be adept at measuring success. They should also serve as the cross-pollinators within your firm to ensure that ideas don't live in a vacuum, and to help you leverage any other programs or campaigns that may benefit your agenda.
- Today's challenge: Don't assume you know what your clients think of you and your firm. I recently heard a business manager in a GC's office at a Fortune 100 company speak about innovations being rolled out by many law firms. While firms think that they are adding value, often the client doesn't see the offering in the same light. Instead, clients may find the innovation to be a detractor to their goals and quite likely see the innovation as creating more work on their end! Having been in the audience for more GC panel discussions than I can count, when asked the question of whether or not they would appreciate it if their clients asked for feedback, the unanimous response has been “absolutely, but most do not ask.”
Tomorrow's opportunity: Be the firm who asks. If most don't ask, this represents a huge area of opportunity. Having an active and ongoing dialogue with your clients and the business managers within the GC's office will help you deliver better service, and will enhance your level of service to other clients. The “downside” is that you may hear feedback that is not all glowing, but in this state of discomfort is where opportunities lie. Work with your M&BD team to develop a formal, systemized process for seeking feedback from your clients. And be prepared to act upon what you learn. If you are going to demonstrate to your client that you're serious about using the information they have taken the time to provide, you must incorporate that feedback into the relationship moving forward.
Transformation is imperative for the law firm of the future and it does not occur in one's comfort zone. A transformative firm does not lie in waiting to see what other firms do and then repackage it to fit their branding. If you do what everyone else is doing then you are the same as everyone else. True differentiation takes confidence and the courage to take action. We are fortunate to live and work during a time when our bold acts can, and should, be fortified by hard data to guide us through the risk/reward test. Competent leaders must be willing to test new solutions, experiment with fresh strategies, learn from failures and be resilient enough to recover quickly.
While these scenarios represent only a few areas to explore, you should ensure that your M&BD teams are empowered to hold your firm accountable, embrace change, and oppose complacency. It will take a fair amount of honest self-reflection, patience and commitment to weather the resulting changes. But, those with the resolution to embrace the discomfort will be the ones left standing.
Jennifer Scalzi is a member of the board of directors of the Legal Marketing Association and the CEO of Calibrate Legal, Inc. She can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Rethink Everything' or 'Optimize What's Working'? The Right Law Firm Strategy
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250