After a Record 2017, No Signs of Law Firm Merger Mania Slowing
Altman Weil Inc. said there were 102 mergers last year, topping the record of 91 set in 2015. The long-running factors remain the same. But several new questions have also arisen.
January 03, 2018 at 01:04 PM
5 minute read
A new record for law firm mergers was set last year at 102, marking a 12 percent increase from the previous record, 91, set in 2015, according to legal consultancy Altman Weil Inc.'s MergerLine, which has tracked law firm deals for the past 11 years.
That last year would set a record became clear after nine months, when 76 deals had already been announced. There were 26 deals announced in the last quarter of the year, topping the 25 seen during the fourth quarter of 2016.
Many factors have been said to be driving this continued consolidation craze. Anxiety over a law firm's place in a fast-changing market; a lack of money to invest in increasingly necessary technology; and rainmaker retirements. The nature of big begets bigger. And, of course, a continued flat-demand market where volatility puts firms one rough year away from looking weak—to competitors and to their own top partners.
Here's one less-talked-about reason that may contribute to the merger mood: Younger managing partners, at firms of all sizes, are more willing to engage in merger discussions than their baby boomer predecessors, said Thomas Clay, a principal at Altman Weil.
“I really think there is a phenomenon going on where the baby boomers are finally moving aside, and other people with very different worldviews and time horizons are willing to look at things that the boomers in a lot of ways always said. 'No way, no how,'” Clay said. “They just don't automatically reject the idea of joining another organization.”
Younger partners are taking part in strategic planning sessions, Clay said, and those often involve more open discussions about the benefits of joining a larger firm.
The overwhelming majority of the deals tracked by MergerLine continue to be acquisitions of small firms. Acquisitions of firms with two-to-20 lawyers accounted for 80 percent of deals tracked in 2017, which is roughly in-line with prior years.
Of those smaller deals, the top three inbound destinations were Florida, New York and Texas, according to Altman Weil. Of the deals involving more than 20 lawyers, 40 percent were international and 25 percent involved firms acquired in California.
Last year also saw a record number of cross-border deals, 16, which topped the previous high of 11 set in 2016, Altman Weil said. Those deals were driven by the largest firms, primarily Dentons, DLA Piper and Norton Rose Fulbright, which have used continuous combinations as a long-term strategy for growth.
Dentons, for instance, completed seven international combinations last year, Altman Weil said. The nearly 8,000-lawyer global legal giant absorbed Maclay Murray & Spens, a 200-lawyer Scottish firm; Boekel, a 70-lawyer shop in the Netherlands; as well as small firms in Mexico, Myanmar, Peru, Uganda and Uzbekistan.
Norton Rose's acquisition of Chadbourne & Parke's roughly 300 lawyers was the largest deal involving a U.S. firm last year, Altman Weil said. Norton Rose, which has been busy in recent years bolting on firms around the world, added another 179 lawyers by absorbing Australia's Henry Davis York.
DLA Piper tacked on 150-lawyer Danish firm LETT, 50-lawyer Portuguese firm ABBC and 60-lawyer Los Angeles firm Liner.
The Altman Weil report came a day after another report, from Fairfax Associates, said that law firm merger activity reached a level not seen since 2001. Fairfax Associates said there were 65 completed mergers in 2017, compared to 58 mergers in 2016. The Fairfax report said the record for mergers was set in 2001, at 86. (One difference between the Fairfax Associates and Altman Weil reports is that Fairfax tracks “completed” mergers, while Altman Weil tracks “announced” mergers, leading to a disparity in their numbers each year.)
Altman Weil's Clay said he sees no reason why the mergers will abate in 2018.
“Given the demography of leadership, the declining demand and the pressures that brings, I don't see why it would [slow down] over the next several years,” Clay said.
The New Year has already seen a flurry of merger announcements.
Eversheds Sutherland, formed last year through an international merger between Atlanta's Sutherland Asbill & Brennan and U.K. firm Eversheds, announced Tuesday that it would formal absorb a Dutch affiliate of eight partners and 32 lawyers previously known as Faasen & Partners.
Jackson Lewis, meanwhile, said Tuesday that it had absorbed 15 lawyers in St. Louis from local labor and employment firm Lowenbaum Law. And McGuireWoods Consulting, a lobbying arm of the Am Law 100 firm of the same name, has opened a new office in Tallahassee, Florida, with the acquisition of three lobbyists formerly affiliated with the Advantage Consulting Team.
So, law firm managing partners can expect more calls from competitors interested in merging. What to do about it? Clay has at least one piece of advice: Don't be lured into a deal over what he calls “Jack Daniel's dinners.”
“They have a good dinner together. Then they say, 'I like those guys,'” Clay said. “They're meeting three or four people out of a couple hundred. Don't get all excited.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuchanan Ingersoll Launches in Chicago With 17-Lawyer Team From Locke Lord
4 minute readLongtime Reed Smith Health Care Partner Opts for Solo Practice Over Retirement
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250