Client Who Stood Up for Boies Goes Public in Sex Trafficking Case
After first outing herself to defend David Boies in a letter to The New York Times, Sarah Ransome is giving up the pseudonym "Jane Doe 43" in a sexual trafficking lawsuit against billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
January 08, 2018 at 05:25 PM
4 minute read
David Boies, Boies Schiller Flexner
“Jane Doe 43″ has formally identified herself as Sarah Ransome in a sexual trafficking lawsuit that her lawyers at Boies Schiller Flexner are pursuing against former Palm Beach billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
In a notice to change the case caption filed Friday in Manhattan federal court, Ransome's attorneys said she “no longer intends to proceed by way of pseudonym” in the case, which claims the financier forced her to have sex for money.
Defense lawyers for Epstein had argued Ransome must litigate under her own name after she wrote a Nov. 15 letter to The New York Times, which the Times published, defending Boies Schiller and firm chairman David Boies against criticism stemming from Boies' work for Harvey Weinstein.
Ransome identified herself as Jane Doe 43 in the Times letter, which said Boies “heard me and came to my rescue” when others refused to take her allegations against Epstein seriously. “For the first time in 10 years I finally feel safe because of David Boies and his colleagues,” wrote Ransome, who also said the firm did not charge her legal fees.
The letter was prompted by a Nov. 9 Times op-ed by Stanford University law professor Deborah Rhode, titled “David Boies's Egregious Involvement With Harvey Weinstein.” Written in the wake of revelations in The New Yorker that Boies had engaged private investigators to kill an investigation by Times reporters into Weinstein's alleged sexual predations, the op-ed suggested Boies' work for Weinstein was unethical, partly because the Times' was a Boies Schiller client.
Two days earlier on Nov. 7, following publication of The New Yorker article, Boies issued a statement addressed to his firm, stating Weinstein was no longer a client and stressing he “would never knowingly participate in an effort to intimidate or silence women or anyone else.”
In a Nov. 21 brief in the Epstein litigation, defense lawyer Michael Miller of Steptoe & Johnson argued Ransome had never satisfied requirements to file anonymously and had publicly identified herself with her letter to the Times so she should be required to add her name to the case caption.
Sigrid McCawley, a Boies Schiller partner in the firm's Fort Lauderdale office who represents Ransome along with Boies and others, said her client ultimately chose to go public with her name “in the hopes that her courage will inspire other Epstein victims to speak their truth.”
In 2008, Epstein entered a guilty plea to state charges in West Palm Beach of soliciting an underage prostitute, which led to an 18-month jail term and placement on the national sex offender registry.
Epstein paid millions of dollars in restitution to as many as 40 victims who were between the ages of 13 and 17 when the crimes occurred.
He also reached a secret nonprosecution agreement with federal prosecutors, which victims criticized as a “sweetheart deal” that left them with no opportunity to object to the agreement and triggered a victims' right lawsuit.
Multiple plaintiffs have filed civil complaints against Epstein, including one listing allegations that President Donald Trump's winter White House, Mar-a-Lago, was the location of events that led to sex trafficking.
Epstein has argued the New York court should dismiss the case because Ransome failed to state a substantiated claim and because the claims she makes are barred by the statute of limitations.
Steptoe's Miller had no immediate comment for this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Eckert Seamans Sues Former Client Over $300K in Unpaid Legal Fees
- 2Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
- 3Ben & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
- 4Gold Medal Grift? Caitlyn Jenner Accused in Crypto Fraud Scheme
- 5Jay Clayton, Ex-SEC Chief and Sullivan & Cromwell Lawyer, Eyed For Manhattan US Attorney's Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250