'Clients need these services' - why so many top firms are doubling down on white collar crime
The number of partners who identify white-collar criminal defence and investigations as their primary practice focus has more than doubled at Am Law 200 firms since 2011
January 19, 2018 at 03:34 PM
4 minute read
Step into any of 2,600-lawyer Hogan Lovells' 51 offices worldwide, and prepare to bump into more than a few partners who know their way around a criminal indictment.
The firm employs 141 lawyers worldwide who are engaged in white-collar criminal defence and investigations practices, including 42 partners and five who hold firm leadership positions, including Steve Immelt, CEO since 2014, and a former assistant US attorney in Maryland.
Not surprisingly, Immelt is eager to extoll the virtues of a strong white-collar criminal defence and investigations practice at big law firms like his.
"The upside is terrific. They are large matters that involve lots of people," he said. His firm's rivals - he cited Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom; Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr and Covington & Burling - "have all done extremely well" with such practices, Immelt added.
His list, however, could extend much further.
According to research by ALM Legal Intelligence, the number of partners who identify white-collar criminal defence and investigations practices as their primary focus has more than doubled at top 200 US law firms since 2011. That was the year Charles Weisselberg, a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley School of Law, published "Big Law's Sixth Amendment: The Rise of Corporate White-Collar Practices in Large US Law Firms."
Using Am Law 200 data available at the time, Weisselberg identified 1,626 partners with substantial white-collar and internal investigations practices. This month, ALM Legal Intelligence combed the 2017 Am Law rankings and found 3,472 partners who were identified as having substantial white-collar criminal defence and internal investigations practices.
For his study, Weisselberg also identified the number of partners with white-collar criminal defense and investigations practices who had moved into firm leadership positions - at least 240 fit that description back then, the law professor calculated.
Mark Filip, a Kirkland & Ellis partner in Chicago and Washington DC, who previously served as second-in-command at the US Department of Justice, wears multiple leadership hats at his 2,000-plus lawyer firm, which has 60 partners and 30 other lawyers engaged in its white-collar criminal defence and investigations practices. Filip leads Kirkland's government enforcement defence and internal investigations group, co-leads its litigation department, and sits on its 15-member worldwide management committee.
"Government investigations and litigation against corporations has increased substantially in recent years - because of the growth of qui tam suits, state attorney general-led suits, and the overall expansion of federal regulation. As a result, white-collar and regulatory practices have expanded in a similar way," Filip said in an email. "Many of the lawyers who practice in this area have strong experience, both in court and as leaders, in high-stakes situations when they served in the government, and many of them have continued to apply those skills and experiences in private practice within their firms."
At 2,500-plus-lawyer Jones Day, about 75 lawyers are part of the firm's white-collar criminal defence and investigations practices. Jones Day boasts more than 40 former federal prosecutors, including four former US attorneys.
Ted Chung of Jones Day. HANDOUT.Ted Chung, a partner and leader of the firm's investigations and white-collar defence practice group, tags corporate clients' demand as the reason for the growth. "Clients need these services. There is a higher level in sophistication in board rooms and corporate leadership about the value of conducting an internal investigation, even if there isn't an ongoing government investigation," he said. "A lot of it is about understanding the facts," he added.
With the growth of international regulatory scrutiny, particularly surrounding bribery allegations, Chung forecasts Big Law's love affair with white-collar criminal defence practices and prosecutorial experience won't end any time soon.
Hogan Lovells' Immelt agreed. "Firms are making this investment … because of the number and variety of people doing those investigations," he said. "At one time, it was just the US attorneys and DOJ - now you've got global players and state attorney generals. It's a natural response to the needs of the clients for sophisticated legal advice in matters that could hurt them both reputationally and financially."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Industry Braces for Hard-Line Approach to Region
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250