Law Firm Revenue, Profits Up in 2017: Wells Fargo Report
A Wells Fargo report shows that firms' financial metrics were generally up across the board in 2017, but the top of the market fared best.
January 31, 2018 at 05:15 PM
3 minute read
After stalling in the third quarter, law firm financial performance finished 2017 on a positive note, with a larger segment of the legal market contributing to upward trends in revenue and profits than in recent years, according to a new report from Wells Fargo & Co.
Wells Fargo Private Bank's Legal Specialty Group on Tuesday released the results of its year-end check-in on law firm financials, showing average increases in revenue and profits between 3 percent and 4 percent for the legal market overall. The report, drawn from a survey of 160 firms, also showed an increase in demand across the law firms participating in the survey.
“The good news is that a broader swath of firms participated in the improving trends than in any year since the recession,” Wells Fargo said in its report.
However, despite positive financial markers overall, Wells Fargo also reported stratification across different segments of the legal industry. The largest and most profitable firms generally outperformed their smaller counterparts with respect to revenue and demand.
Firms in the Am Law 50 reported revenue growth of 6.8 percent in 2017, while the Am Law 100 as a whole reported a 5.26 percent increase in revenue. Firms in the Am Law Second Hundred saw a smaller revenue uptick of 2.33 percent in 2017, the report said.
Profit growth also differed across the different legal market segments, with Am Law 100 firms in the Wells Fargo survey seeing net incomes rise by more than 5 percent while the Am Law Second Hundred firms had a more modest increase of 1.21 percent. Profits per equity partner also rose across the board, but with variations: Am Law 50 firms experienced partner profit growth of 6.17 percent; Am Law 100 firms, overall, saw partner profits rise 5.18 percent; and firms in the Am Law Second Hundred saw partner profits increase a little more than 3 percent.
A similar pattern held true for demand. The Am Law 50 firms in Wells Fargo's survey saw an average increase of 3.3 percent in billable hours in 2017, while the Am Law 100 saw an average increase of 2.14 percent in billable hours. Those figures mark notable differences from 2016, in which demand grew by less than 1 percent for those groups of firms.
The Am Law Second Hundred, in contrast, saw a 0.76 percent drop in billable hours in 2017. Still, that was a slight improvement over the 0.86 percent drop in demand those firms saw in 2016, according to the report.
Looking ahead, Wells Fargo's survey results show that firms predict revenue growth in 2018 of 3.43 percent, although the largest and most profitable firms are more bullish than their smaller counterparts. Firms in the Am Law 100 forecast revenue growth of 4.42 percent, while those in the Am Law Second Hundred predicted a revenue increase of 2.87 percent in 2018, according to the report.
Wells Fargo also said that firms seem “uniformly more optimistic” about the number of hours their lawyers will log in 2018 regardless of firm size. The bank's report showed that firms, overall, forecast an uptick in hours logged of about 2.4 percent in 2018.
“The enthusiasm is derived from a slight-to-moderate improvement in transactional activity,” the Wells Fargo report said. “Most believe the corporate tax changes and a general improvement in our economy will buoy corporate, M&A, capital markets, and other transactional work.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Never Been More Dynamic': Big Law Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readLaw Firms Are In a Strong Spot, But Their Continued 'Growth Mindset' Comes With Challenges
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250