Survey Says Jones Day, Skadden, Latham Have Other Brands Beat
Jones Day was again the top-ranked U.S. law firm in an annual survey by Acritas Research.
February 12, 2018 at 02:10 PM
2 minute read
For the second year in a row, Jones Day landed the top spot in an annual law firm brand survey released Monday by Acritas Research Ltd.
Jones Day unsurprisingly welcomed the news. “We continue to look for ways to differentiate with innovative and meaningful solutions for our clients and are proud that our efforts are memorable,” said Washington, D.C., appellate litigator Glen Nager, the firm's client affairs partner.
Acritas, a law firm marketing consulting organization, based its U.S. Law Firm Brand Index on a survey of 601 respondents who have senior responsibility for buying legal services at organizations with $1 billion or more in revenues. Survey respondents were polled about the law firms' awareness and favorability and asked how likely they would be to choose the firms for top-level litigation, M&A matters, and overall use.
Acritas also compiles an international brand index, and, for the first time this year, has conducted surveys to rank alternative legal service providers. The alternative provider rankings will be released later this week.
In the U.S. law firm survey, Jones Day surpassed Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom as the leading firm last year, and this year it led the rankings by an even wider margin, according to Acritas' findings.
“Jones Day is more favored this year for its practical style of delivery, along with its global coverage and breadth of services—all areas we know align with clients' evolving needs especially now that half of legal departments are assigning responsibility for optimizing legal operations,” Lizzy Duffy, vice president for Acritas U.S., said in a statement.
Following Jones Day and Skadden, in the rankings' third, fourth and fifth spots, respectively, were Latham & Watkins; Sidley Austin; and Baker McKenzie.
The remaining firms, in order of their rankings, are: DLA Piper; Kirkland & Ellis; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius; Hogan Lovells; Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz; K&L Gates; Norton Rose Fulbright; McDermott Will & Emery; Ropes & Gray; Weil, Gotshal & Manges; Sullivan & Cromwell; Mayer Brown; King & Spalding; Dentons; and Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
- 1Aging Condo Neglect Leads to $1M Payout in Miami Beach Slip and Fall
- 2‘BiT Global Lost’: Federal Judge Won’t Stop Coinbase From Delisting wBTC Token
- 3Some Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
- 4Judge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
- 5EPA grants California authority to ban sales of new gas cars by 2035. Action faces reversal by Trump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
