Quinn Unloads on Faith Gay: $100 Million for 'Ingratitude' and 'Deception'
John Quinn said he was irritated by Faith Gay's "saccharine" farewell email to her Quinn Emanuel colleagues, and disappointed with "the stealthy way" he accused her of planning to launch her new firm.
February 16, 2018 at 02:52 PM
4 minute read
How upset was John Quinn, the managing partner of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, when New York partners Faith Gay and Philippe Selendy left this month to launch their own firm?
The firm's pre-emptive press release on their departures was one sign that the split was not particularly amicable. But a reply-all email that Quinn sent Gay this week—responding to her farewell message to the firm—spells out his feelings more clearly.
“Faith, I wish I could join in the high minded sentiment you express here. Some day maybe I will be able to. But not yet. At this time I am still perhaps too mindful of other facts,” Quinn wrote, according to Above The Law, which first reported the email. “Such as that you really were not very well known at all when you joined us from White and Case. That during your time with us we supported you in every way we could and, I think, made you a legal star. That during your time with us you were paid well over $100m—far more than you ever dreamed you could earn.”
Quinn also accused Gay of secretly plotting her departure for months, ending his message with a retort to a poem that Gay had cited in her departure memo.
“You are now planning to take as much of our work as possible. And to recruit as many of our attorneys as possible. I can tell you that virtually all of the attorneys you name here are pretty angry with you,” Quinn wrote. “There must be a poem about deception or ingratitude that would be more apposite?”
Gay, who formally launched Selendy & Gay with Selendy and other Quinn Emanuel lawyers on Thursday, was not immediately available to comment.
“Yes, I wrote that and it's all true. I wrote it in response to a lengthy saccharine email that Faith sent to all personnel the night before her departure,” Quinn said in an email on Friday. “I was less disappointed, actually, in the fact that she and others were leaving than in the stealthy way it was done, which was at odds with the close relationship we thought we had and which she professed to still have in her email. And yes I was irritated by her email. In the meantime, our New York practice is booming.”
When asked if he felt similarly stung by Selendy, Quinn again cited Gay's “over the top” email. “I replied to that email, in reaction to that particular email,” he said. “Others wrote goodbye emails, but they weren't similar at all, weren't irritating and didn't motivate me to respond.”
The dust-up comes after the firm in January announced that Gay, the former co-chair of the firm's national trial practice, and Selendy, a star litigator and former head of Quinn Emanuel's securities and structured finance group, would be leaving with a group of colleagues to start their own law firm.
Quinn said in a statement at the time that he and others at the firm respected “our valued colleagues' decision to take their practice to a smaller platform” and didn't believe the partner losses would affect the firm's success in any significant way.
“Our firm has never been stronger and has never had a deeper bench of veteran and next-generation talent,” Quinn said in the January statement.
Selendy and Gay remained mostly quiet in the press afterward, before finally detailing their plans this week in connection with the formal launch on Feb. 15 of Selendy & Gay.
In an interview shortly before the launch, Gay and Selendy told The American Lawyer that their departure wasn't a matter of dissatisfaction with Quinn Emanuel.
“It really has everything to do with wanting to be masters of our own fate,” Gay said at the time. “It's us wanting to create a new kind of law firm, nothing about any displeasure.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readEckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250