Nixon Peabody Sees Partner Profits Surge
With a continued focus on delivering better value to clients, Nixon Peabody saw gains in gross revenue and profits per partner in 2017.
February 22, 2018 at 06:17 PM
4 minute read
After a flat financial year in 2016, Nixon Peabody saw its top line grow 3.4 percent last year, to $473 million.
Revenue per lawyer at the firm, which as a result of a 1999 merger has its roots in Boston and Rochester, New York, grew 6.4 percent in 2017, to $787,000, up from $740,000 the year before. Profits per partner jumped 13.4 percent, to $1.1 million, up from $980,000 in 2016.
“We were very proud of our year,” said Nixon Peabody's CEO and managing partner Andrew Glincher, who assumed leadership of the firm in early 2011 after scuttled merger talks with Locke Lord.
Glincher attributed the firm's bolstered top line to organic growth fueled by a commitment to a strategy designed to deliver better value to clients.
“We had a great year because of strategic investments we've been making in our talent, in our focus on the marketplace, [making] our collaborations better,” Glincher said. “We're providing newer and better value to our clients in different ways.”
Part of that investment was setting up an office in Raleigh, North Carolina, in October with the addition of four partners from K&L Gates. The opening of the outpost, Nixon Peabody's 13th office nationally and first in the southeastern U.S., was not initially a part of the firm's strategic plan, but a relationship with a $10 billion corporate client who wanted to use the firm more and more fueled its move to North Carolina's Research Triangle.
“That's how we want to grow … by client demand,” said Glincher, who declined to name the entity that lured Nixon Peabody to Tobacco Road. “Our best growth has been our clients wanting to increase their business and trust in us and that's worked out fabulously.”
Many of Nixon Peabody's offices had good years in 2017, said Glincher, noting specifically those in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and New York. (Nixon Peabody's Chicago office expanded three years ago after the firm absorbed local shop Ungaretti & Harris.) The firm saw growth across all of its practices, but most notably in corporate, real estate, M&A and litigation, the latter of which includes its white-collar and government investigations group, Glincher said.
Nixon Peabody had a role in representing Dutch soft drink bottler Refresco Group NV in its $1.25 billion purchase of Toronto-based soda manufacturer Cott Corp. The firm also advised longtime client Constellation Brands Inc., the spirits giant and owner of the Corona beer brand, on its $200 million purchase of a 9.9 percent stake in Smith Falls, Ontario-based Canopy Growth Corp., the world's largest publicly traded cannabis company.
Despite growth in its financials, the firm's total head count decreased 2.7 percent, to 602. The total number of equity partners also decreased 7 percent, to 133 in 2017, down from 143 the year before.
One of the firm's few lateral departures included the national leader of its intellectual property litigation practice, Russell Genet, who early last year decamped for a position as director for litigation financier Longford Capital Management LP.
Glincher said that Nixon Peabody has also worked over the last year to promote diversity initiatives across the firm.
“Diversity has also been at the top of my list—there's no goal that's more important,” said Glincher, noting that 40 percent of the firm's office managing partners are diverse, a group that includes its new Washington, D.C., managing partner Colette Dafoe.
In addition to the implementation of programs such as the Mansfield Rule and a RampUp program for parents, the firm has also worked in its community to promote diversity.
In October, Nixon Peabody's San Francisco office donated 2,300 square feet of its 16th floor and partnered with nonprofit LGBT business accelerator StartOut to launch the StartOut Growth Lab, where aspiring entrepreneurs can receive free legal advice and business know-how from the firm's lawyers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSquire Patton Boggs Associate Among Those Killed in String of Methanol Poisonings
1 minute readMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute read'There Is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250