Lawyers, Developers Team Up in Hackathon to Revamp Legal Industry
The winning team of a “Global Legal Hackathon” recently hosted by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe aims to provide a platform to fund and expedite class action suits using blockchain technology.
February 27, 2018 at 04:38 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The winning team of the recent “Global Legal Hackathon” hosted by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in San Francisco seeks to provide a platform to fund and expedite class action suits using blockchain technology.
The nine-member group, consisting of an Orrick lawyer, two law students and six engineers and developers, came together on Feb. 23 at Orrick's San Francisco office to participate in a worldwide hackathon designed to create concepts and technical solutions to address justice and law practice issues.
“It is not that the legal industry is reluctant to adopt the technologies, it's just the design problems the legal industry faces are much harder,” said Mohamed Shakir, who brought with him a team of five engineers and designers from consulting firm Keystone Strategy LLC. Shakir is a technical engagement manager and head of Keystone Labs.
Zac Padgett, a managing associate at Orrick in Portland, Oregon, echoed Shakir's sentiment.
“The legal industry is not immune to disruption,” he said. “The industry, just like other established industries, is susceptible to technology. Change is inevitable [and] it is time to focus on it.”
Andrew Glidden, a law student at the University of California, Berkeley, and head of legal research at Blockchain@BerkeleyLaw, said that the structure of private law firms doesn't put them in the best possible position to invest in new technologies.
“Lawyers definitely want to be innovative and don't always have the market structure or the technological help that they need to make that happen,” Glidden added. “So, an event like this that focuses on building out legal technologies is so important for our work.”
Together, Glidden, Padgett, Shakir and other legal and technology enthusiasts formed a team called the Spicekit. Their idea was to build a decentralized platform that enables individuals to create a bounty to incentivize lawyers to pursue class action suits, such as potentially fraudulent initial coin offerings.
“Our platform is mostly targeted to these class action suits that are not 'traditionally' attractive to this big financial firm,” Shakir explained.
Spicekit was one of the four teams that joined the competition in San Francisco. The Global Legal Hackathon, which took place from Feb. 23 to Feb. 25, was held simultaneously in 40 cities across six continents.
Orrick of counsel Jason Somensatto in Washington, D.C., who mentors the teams in San Francisco, said the hackathon is the first global-scale event the firm has engaged in that brings together legal and technology professionals to compete with one another to develop legal technology solutions.
“This is probably one of the first opportunities for big firms to really put their toe in this water, on an area that has been a smaller group before today,” he said.
A panel of experts including Owen Byrd, general counsel and chief evangelist at LexisNexis Group-owned legal analytics provider Lex Machina Inc., Margaret Hagan, director of the Legal Design Lab at Stanford Law School, and Jennifer Kelleher, directing attorney at the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, acted as judges for hackathon-related pitches.
The runner-up team, Justice League, designed a system called Circuition to bring clarity and transparency to the legal process by allowing clients to see the progress a lawyer has made on a particular case. Tied for third, team A2J.AI, created a chatbot using artificial intelligence technology to help simplify document procedures for litigants dealing with domestic violence, while keeping sensitive information private. TeamGiga pitched a system named RΞSOLV that uses blockchain technology to create a globally distributed contract dispute resolution network for mediators. TeamGiga also won the Hadfield Challenge Award for creating a new model of dispute resolution.
“I hope some of the vision will continue and maybe [they'll] start a company themselves,” said Shawnna Hoffman, another mentor to the teams and a global cognitive legal co-leader at International Business Machines Corp.
The Spicekit squad will go on to compete in the second hackathon round online, and the global winner will be announced on April 21 after final presentations in New York.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWachtell Helps Miami Dolphins Secure One of NFL’s First Private Equity Deals
3 minute read830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250