Shearman Sees Profits Rise as Revenue Stays Steady
Shearman & Sterling boosted partner profits by 7 percent while barely eking out revenue gains last year.
March 01, 2018 at 06:11 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
While its gross revenue barely budged last year, Shearman & Sterling was able to lift its equity partner profits in 2017 about 7 percent.
Shearman leaders said the main drivers in profitability growth were the firm's “business mix,” and that its strategy is aimed toward growing disproportionately in the United States with corporate clients.
In a signal of these efforts, the firm announced on Thursday that it is moving into Texas—a development that has been in the works for several weeks.
In 2017, gross revenue rose 0.6 percent to $917.5 million. Profits per equity partner increased 7 percent to $2.3 million on an 8.6 percent rise in net income.
With a slight increase in the total number of lawyers, to 853 firmwide, revenue per lawyer decreased less than 1 percent to $1.075 million.
When asked about the modest uptick in revenue, incoming senior partner David Beveridge said as the firm changed its focus, it lost some revenue, “but the revenue we gained has been more profitable.”
“We're looking at this in the long term,” he added. “We saw improvements in our profitability that we were looking for.”
The firm has embraced a focus on high-profit areas, such as finance, U.S. mergers and acquisitions, disputes and investigations, said outgoing senior partner Creighton Condon.
“As we improved our business mix, we've seen a rise in profitability,” Beveridge said.
For instance, in its mergers and acquisitions practice the firm “had a greater mix” of large corporate transactions, Beveridge said.
In one of the largest deals in 2017, Shearman represented CVS on its $69 billion acquisition of Aetna Inc., a deal expected to transform the health care industry. It advised Liberty Global on the completed split-off of Liberty Latin America Ltd. and advised Novartis on its proposed $3.9 billion acquisition of a radiopharmaceutical company.
In finance, Shearman advised on Altice USA's $2.15 billion initial public offering of common stock, one of the largest IPOs in 2017. Other work included advising Credit Suisse as sole book-running manager on the $690 million initial public offering of Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings and advising BNP Paribas, as an administrative agent, for a $15 billion refinancing for Toyota Motor Credit Corp. and some of its affiliates.
In other work for large corporations, Shearman's litigation lawyers secured an appellate victory for Daimler and Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche, after plaintiffs alleged that Daimler and other defendants were liable for their retirement benefits. In another appellate victory, the firm represented Nomura in a mortgage-backed securities dispute in which the New York Court of Appeals reversed a decision against the Japanese financial institution.
The firm's energy lawyers represented the U.S. Department of Transportation in the extension of a $416 million secured loan for an infrastructure project in Colorado and the U.S. Department of Transportation's Build America Bureau on financing the construction of New York's Moynihan Train Hall Redevelopment Project.
Business Management
In addition, the firm's “management of the business,” including controlling vendor and real estate expenses throughout its various offices, helped drive profitability, firm leaders said, but they stressed the primary driver was its combination of client matters.
While London revenue rose by 14 percent to $169.7 million in 2016, the firm declined to disclose London office revenue in 2017.
Shearman, in a high-profile move, expanded in its nonequity ranks in 2016, but the firm had 13 fewer nonequity partners in 2017.
Beveridge said some nonequity partners were promoted to equity, while others left, “and that's what we would have expected.”
“It's going to ebb and flow depending on the year, but right now we don't foresee a significant change in either direction in the near team” in nonequity partners numbers, Beveridge said.
Condon said the firm put the nonequity structure in place to have the flexibility to make adjustments based on business and it “has set the foundation for how we operate business in the future.”
Texas Launch
Meanwhile, the firm announced Thursday its move into Texas, first in Austin, where it is bringing on seven partners and a counsel from Andrews Kurth Kenyon. The eight new Shearman hires all focus on advising emerging growth companies in the technology life sciences and media and telecommunications industries.
Shearman & Sterling also plans to open a Houston office that will focus on energy transactions, including oil and gas projects. ALM affiliate Texas Lawyer has reported that a group of oil and gas lawyers is expected to move to Shearman's new Houston office from Baker Botts.
Shearman leaders said the Austin office is expected to have about 25 to 30 attorneys. The Houston office, which will open in a few months, will have eight to 10 partners by the end of the year, the firm projects.
“We are continuing to invest,” Condon said, “and the firm is fully behind that and it's all part of our long-term strategy.”
Shearman is also considering a larger plan for the Austin office. Beveridge said the firm is exploring the possibility that it would become a site for talented nonpartner-track associates and staff attorneys with “quality of life” considerations. Beveridge said the Austin location is attractive because of its proximity to good universities, its venture capital business and the availability of highly skilled talent who may not want to be on the partnership track.
“It's a good spot to explore,” said Beveridge.
The option for a different sort of Austin office is not part of the immediate plan, however. The office will for now focus on the firm's tech and life sciences practices. The firm already has a staff attorney location in Melville, New York.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Sharp and Profound' Policy Shifts Prompt DC Law Firms to Evaluate Opportunities, Challenges
5 minute readAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
Latham's New Partner Class Leans Toward Corporate Practices
Big Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250