Jenner Revenue Slips, Profits Fall Amid Investments in Talent
Revenue dipped about 2 percent at the litigation powerhouse last year, while profits per partner tumbled nearly 20 percent.
March 02, 2018 at 02:12 PM
4 minute read
Two years removed from one of the strongest two-year financial runs among Am Law 100 firms, Jenner & Block last year saw its second straight year of flat-to-down financial performance.
Revenue at the Chicago-based firm, known for its top-tier litigation practice, dropped 1.9 percent in 2017 to $448.7 million. Profits per partner tumbled nearly 19 percent to $1.4 million.
The fall in PPP stemmed in part from expenses related to a surge in the firm's nonequity partner ranks, which rose about 14 percent to 117 partners last year. Compensation of nonequity partners rose 27 percent from the year prior.
The firm's equity partner ranks expanded from 109 to 111 partners, while total head count jumped 4.3 percent to 508 lawyers.
Jenner had a largely flat financial year in 2016, when revenue dipped 1.6 percent and profits per partner nudged up 1.5 percent. But it grew its head count by nearly 12 percent in 2016, which caused revenue per lawyer to fall nearly 12 percent. The firm in 2016 also topped the Am Law list of Big Law firms dedicated to pro bono, something the firm has done a record eight times.
Flat financial results from 2016 represented the end of a staggering two-year bull run at the firm: From fiscal 2013 to 2015, revenue rose 23 percent and PPP grew 39 percent. Some law firm analysts say litigation-focused firms can have more volatile financial swings.
Managing partner Terrence Truax said the growth in the firm's nonequity ranks last year reflected investments the firm made in a number of newer practice groups, including aviation and energy, as well as in the firm's core practices.
“That's a decision we've made around focusing on those core areas for us that we are hopeful and confident are going to redound to our benefit,” Truax said. “As we think downfield and towards the future, it's very much client-centric as we look at our current mix of clients and how we can better serve them.”
Still, Truax said the firm was not satisfied with its year-end financial performance, and it is “committed to do better.” He said the firm believes that investing in talented practice groups that serve the needs of its clients is what drove the firm's performance from 2013 to 2015 and what will drive it in the future.
“I don't want to be mistaken—our financial performance is key and central in the high-end space we play in,” he said.
The firm began 2017 on a lateral hiring spree, with a string of notable additions in the spring.
In May it brought on Brandon Fox, former chief of the public corruption and civil rights section at the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles. The same month former acting U.S. Solicitor General Ian Gershengorn returned to lead the firm's appeals practice, and the firm took a trio out of the Federal Communications Commission. Jenner also launched an aviation practice in March with the addition of three partners.
Truax said demand for legal services largely remains flat, even if there was a slight pickup in the fourth quarter of the year, as some industry reports suggested. Longer-term, Truax said the firm continues to grow its investment in technology, particularly in knowledge management initiatives.
“Firms that get their head around how to most effectively leverage information to better serve clients are going to be more competitive,” Truax said. “They'll deliver a more efficient, more value-based service to clients. And that's true, too, for a firm like ours that very much wants to be playing in the high-end, bet-the company work.”
Truax said the firm also had a strong year for pro bono in 2017, and the early part of 2018 had given reason for optimism.
“We are excited about some of the work we've recently done and some of the new work we've had in,” Truax said. “And we're excited to translate some of the investment we've made in the last year or so to continue. Those are multiyear exercises that we're very focused on.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeet the Finalists: The American Lawyer's Young Lawyers of The Year
A Law Firm Divided: How Generational Differences Are Fracturing Firms
The Week in Data Aug. 6: A Look at Legal Industry Trends By the Numbers
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250