One-Third of Texas Law Firm Leaders Say They Are Open to Merger Talks
A new survey finds that 82 percent of Texas law firm leaders have been approached over the last year about a potential combination, and 32 percent say they are open to considering it.
March 08, 2018 at 02:15 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Texas' legal market is burning hot, so it's not surprising that 82 percent of law firm leaders in Texas have been approached over the last year about a combination with another firm, according to a new survey.
In addition, 32 percent of those firm leaders said they are open to considering a firm combination over the next three-to-five years.
Results of the 2018 Law Firm Leaders Survey Texas, conducted by consulting company Zeughauser Group and released Thursday, also show that the highest priority growth areas for the firms are, ranked in order of importance, Houston, Dallas, and Austin.
According to the survey, 35 percent of the firm leaders who responded want to expand in Houston, 31 percent in Dallas, and 27 percent in Austin. The survey includes responses from 60 leaders of Texas law firms, ranging in size from 10 to 200 lawyers, with 43 percent of the firms in Houston and 38 percent in Dallas.
Kent Zimmermann, a consultant with Zeughauser Group in Chicago who has worked on a number of mergers involving Texas firms, said the level of interest in mergers expressed by the Texas firm leaders is consistent with what he saw in similar surveys that Zeughauser Group conducted in Chicago and Los Angeles. He said the level of interest in mergers in Chicago and Los Angeles was about the same, but many more firm leaders in Texas have been approached about a merger than in those other markets.
Zimmermann said it seems there is no shortage of firms interested in moving into Texas, or growing in Texas. “A good portion of these firms are attractive combination partners,” he said.
That interest is already playing out in the Texas market. Only weeks into 2018, a number of out-of-state firms have either moved into the state or have opened additional offices there. Firms have also expanded with lateral hires. High-profile market moves in 2018 in Texas include White & Case's new office in Houston, Shearman & Sterling's new office in Austin (with one in the works in Houston,) and a new office in Dallas for Katten Muchin Rosenman, which has Houston and Austin offices.
Additionally, Houston-based Andrews Kurth Kenyon is merging on April 2 with Virginia firm Hunton & Williams, while Dallas-based Gardere Wynne Sewell is in merger talks with Foley & Lardner. Another Dallas-based firm, Strasburger & Price, is in talks with Clark Hill.
The firm leaders who participated in the survey are more bullish on their firms' future prospects than on the Texas legal market as a whole. A total of 84 percent were optimistic about the future of their own firm, but only 69 percent were optimistic about the future of the overall environment for Texas law firms. A total of 65 percent of the leaders expect the level of competition from out-of-state firms will grow some, and 24 percent said it will grow significantly. Only 11 percent expect it to decrease.
The firm leaders said the top objectives of combining with another firm are to increase profitability, put the firm on a long-term path to stability, enhance a competitive position relative to larger competing firms, and bolster the firm's breadth and depth in a chosen area of strength.
Litigation is the area that the law firm leaders most want to expand over the next three to five years, with 56 percent targeting that practice. Additionally, 40 percent want to expand corporate, 27 percent are looking to add in labor and employment, 24 percent in energy and 23 percent in real estate.
Zimmermann pointed out that the demographics of the firms included in the survey may be a factor in that litigation-heavy result. About 58 percent of the headcount of the firms that responded focus on litigation, followed by 16 percent on real estate, 15 percent on corporate work, 13 percent on intellectual property and 7 percent on energy.
While Houston, Dallas and Austin are the cities where the Texas firm leaders are most interested in growing over the next three to five years, 6 percent of the firm leaders want to do the same in Chicago. In addition, 5 percent want to grow in New York, San Antonio or Washington, D.C., and 3 percent are looking at Denver, Miami or the Silicon Valley. Only 2 percent are targeting Atlanta, Los Angeles, New Orleans and Seattle, according to the survey.
The law firm leaders in the survey said the need to transition client relationships to the next generation is one of the top challenges they face. Zimmermann said that is a big focus at many firms. “That's a huge worry to firms, especially when there is not a next generation of business developers in the firm who are going to carry the firm forward with strength,” he said.
One of the other top challenges, according to the survey, is transitioning leadership to the next generation. Sixty percent of the firm leaders identified this as one of their three biggest challenges.
Zimmermann said that it is this leadership transition issue that may actually force firms to consider a merger, as a new generation of leaders sees more long-term advantages to a combination than leaders who will retire in five to 10 years.
“Typically, it's that next generation of talent that brings the conversation [around] to the future,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWachtell Helps Miami Dolphins Secure One of NFL’s First Private Equity Deals
3 minute read830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250