Kramer Levin Financials Again Hit Record High
The firm's 2017 profits per partner topped $2 million for the first time.
March 09, 2018 at 03:59 PM
4 minute read
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel posted a second consecutive year of record financial results in 2017, earning a gross revenue of $387 million as its profits per equity partner exceeded $2 million for the first time, according to preliminary ALM reporting.
The firm's gross revenue of $387 million marks a 9.9 percent increase over the $352 million posted in 2016. The firm's net income also grew 9.9 percent, rising to $152.76 million in 2017 from $138.95 million in 2016.
Revenue per lawyer and profits per equity partner also grew in 2017 at the 326-lawyer firm. Kramer Levin had an RPL value of $1.187 million, up 7.9 percent over the $1.1 million the firm posted in its 2016 results. And, after nearing $2 million in partner profits in 2016, Kramer Levin passed that milestone in 2017, with a PPP figure of $2.152 million.
Kramer Levin managing partner Paul Pearlman said he was pleased with the firm's results, noting that the 2017 financials were record highs and came after the firm had previously reached records in 2016.
“It was a very strong year for our firm,” said Pearlman. “It was gratifying to us to put together such strong back-to-back years.”
He added that the firm's positive results in 2017 stemmed from contributions on both sides of the Atlantic. Kramer Levin has offices in New York and Silicon Valley in the U.S., as well as an outpost in Paris.
“It was a record year for all our financial metrics and was a combination of what happened in New York and Paris,” Pearlman said.
The firm's headcount remained relatively stable, rising from 320 lawyers in 2016 to 326 in 2017. Kramer Levin hired four lateral partners in 2017—three in New York and one in Paris—and its partnership ranks comprised 71 equity partners and 36 non-equity partners. Overall, the firm's partner count experienced year-over-year growth of 2.9 percent.
Pearlman said lawyers in each of the firm's key practices were firing on all cylinders, including its corporate, restructuring, litigation and real estate and land use groups.
Among other work, the firm represented VICI Properties, a real estate investment trust (REIT) that grew out of the Caesars Entertainment Corp. bankruptcy in a series of transactions toward the end of 2017 and into 2018. That work included advising on VICI's formation in October and in November a $1.14 billion deal in which the REIT acquired land and real property improvements associated with the Harrah's Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas and leased it back to Caesars Entertainment. In February, VICI completed a $1.4 billion initial public offering, and while the deal closed this year, a chunk of the work took place in 2017.
On the litigation front, Kramer Levin's white-collar team, led by partner Barry Berke, represented New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio in connection with investigations into the politician's fundraising efforts. That work, which resulted in a dropped investigation with no allegations of wrongdoing against de Blasio, reportedly racked up fees of at least $2 million.
The firm's restructuring group also remained active in 2017, picking up roles for creditors committees in the bankruptcies of retailer Toys “R” Us Inc. and oil and gas drilling contractor Seadrill Ltd. Describing the body of work in 2017 and the firm's back-to-back record financial years, Pearlman said they can be attributed to the breadth of practices at Kramer Levin and a relatively even contribution from those groups to the firm's business.
“For a firm of our size, we have tremendous balance,” Pearlman said. “Whether the economy is good or bad, we seem to perform pretty well.”
Looking ahead, Pearlman is not expecting any major disruptions in the firm's business. As evidence of a continued string of success, he said so far Kramer Levin was keeping active in 2018.
“We tend to be a firm that's steady as it goes,” he said. “The first two months of this year have been extremely busy. In fact, our billable hours per day, in three of the last four months, were among the highest that we've ever had.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Partner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readFrom Guaranteed Comp to Ethics Screens, How Big Law Navigates the Revolving Door
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250