Shook Hardy Grows Revenue, Profits
Madeleine McDonough, who has been chairwoman of the firm for about a year, said Shook Hardy has implemented a new strategy, which is working.
March 12, 2018 at 03:14 PM
3 minute read
Shook, Hardy & Bacon posted positive financial results in 2017, including revenue of more than $350 million and partner profits nearing $1 million, as the firm's overall head count ticked down, according to preliminary ALM data.
Shook Hardy, often known for its primacy in products liability litigation, had gross revenue of $350.7 million in 2017, a 5 percent increase over its prior year results. The firm also posted net income of $118.34 million, an 8.3 percent rise compared with 2016.
Profits per equity partner were also up, rising 15.1 percent to $931,000 in 2017, as was revenue per lawyer, which grew 6.8 percent and came in at $751,000. The financial results accompanied a slight contraction in the firm's lawyer count—Shook Hardy had 467 lawyers in 2017, down 1.7 percent from the 475 lawyers on the roster in 2016. Meanwhile, the firm in 2017 experienced a 5.9 percent decline in its equity partnership ranks, which fell from 135 to 127, and a 3.5 percent increase in the nonequity ranks, which grew from 85 to 88.
Shook Hardy chairwoman Madeleine McDonough, coming off her first full year at the firm's helm, said in 2017 the firm reaped benefits from a strategic plan focused on introducing clients to different practice areas within the firm. The idea behind that strategy, McDonough said, was to help the firm expand its relationships with clients and promote a broader awareness about the firm's offerings.
Madeleine McDonoughAlthough products liability defense has been Shook Hardy's bread-and-butter practice, the firm also has intellectual property, commercial litigation and environmental and toxic tort expertise—the firm's strategic plan aimed to introduce longtime products liability clients to those other groups, and to do the same in reverse, introducing IP or commercial litigation clients to all practices at the firm, according to McDonough.
“We reworked our strategic plan and we've really executed on it,” McDonough said. “What we're seeing is a lot of our longstanding clients … consolidating their portfolio, their work, with us.”
Beyond Shook Hardy's efforts to introduce clients across practices, McDonough noted that the firm is actively looking to expand with new hires in its key litigation specialties. The firm chair said Shook Hardy is “in a growth mode” and it is “a robust period for the firm.”
“Lateral hiring is also a focus of ours,” McDonough said. “We're trying to find really good strategic fits who have an understanding of our clients … but can also litigate and try cases.”
In 2017, the firm's lateral hires included Sharon Israel, a Houston-based IP litigator who joined in August from Mayer Brown, and Buffy Mims, a products liability litigator who joined in Washington, D.C., from Hollingsworth.
McDonough said Israel and Mims reflect a larger trend at Shook Hardy—it has increasingly become a welcome professional home for women and minority lawyers, who are often leading the firm's trial teams and holding leadership roles.
“I really think if you look at other firms, they do not have the depth of trial lawyers, and, particularly, diverse trial lawyers,” McDonough said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Greenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 3Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 4As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
- 5The Gold Standard: Remembering Judge Jeffrey Alker Meyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250