Record Profits, Revenue for Schulte Roth in 2017
The firm built on steady years in 2015 and 2016, increasing its revenues and profits to their highest-ever levels in 2017.
March 15, 2018 at 04:44 PM
4 minute read
Alan S. Waldenberg of Schulte Roth & Zabel. |
Schulte Roth & Zabel had another year of steady financial growth in 2017, posting record revenue north of $424 million and partner profits higher than $2.5 million, also a record high.
Building on steady results in 2016 and 2015, Schulte Roth took in gross revenue of $424.1 million in 2017, up 3.6 percent over the prior year's results of $409.5 million. Revenue per lawyer at the 357-attorney firm was $1.188 million, a 1.8 percent increase compared with the prior year, according to preliminary ALM data.
The firm's profits also grew in 2017 compared with 2016, with net income rising 5.7 percent to $209.8 million and profits per partner growing 7 percent to $2.56 million. In 2017, Schulte Roth counted 82 partners in its equity ranks, down from 83 in 2016; the firm has no nonequity partners.
“We think we had a terrific year. We had a record year in revenue, in profits and profits per partner,” said partner and executive committee chairman Alan Waldenberg.
Waldenberg said Schulte Roth's 2017 results were the product of contributions from across the firm, including its transactional and fund formation specialists, activist shareholder practice and litigation group. The firm, he said, completed “numerous multibillion-dollar fund launches” for clients such as Cerberus Capital Management and Bridgestone Capital in the United States and London-based hedge fund Marshall Wace.
On the transactions front, Schulte Roth guided private equity firm Veritas Capital to an acquisition of PricewaterhouseCoopers' U.S. public sector consulting business. The firm also has a key role in a currently pending deal announced in February, serving as legal adviser to grocery chain Albertsons Cos. on a proposed merger with Rite Aid Corp.
“Every year we're good for a couple really, really large deals,” said Waldenberg.
The Schulte Roth executive committee chair also highlighted the firm's shareholder activism group, describing it as “the premier shareholder activist practice in the country.” One high-profile assignment for that group in 2017 involved representing billionaire investor Nelson Peltz in a proxy battle with Procter & Gamble Co. Although Peltz ended up falling short in his proxy battle, the activism effort led to a P&G announcement late in 2017 that Peltz would join the company's board.
The shareholder activist group at Schulte Roth was also the beneficiary of the firm's only lateral hire in 2017. Early in the year, the firm brought on Aneliya Crawford from Olshan Frome Wolosky, a lawyer who was part of the team that represented Peltz in the P&G proxy fight.
The firm's litigation team also stayed busy in 2017 as lead defense counsel in a corruption case against Joseph Percoco, a former aide in the administration of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. That case involved an eight-week trial that, on Wednesday, resulted in a mixed verdict that convicted the former Cuomo aide on three of the six charges he faced.
While that representation is ongoing, Schulte Roth picked up another high-profile case recently, having been retained as defense counsel for former Equifax Inc. chief information officer Jun Ying, who was charged on Wednesday with insider trading related to stock he allegedly sold before the credit rating company publicly acknowledged its massive data breach last summer.
Looking ahead, Waldenberg said the first several weeks of 2018 have him optimistic that Schulte Roth will remain on a positive financial trajectory.
“All our practices seem to be busy and all our clients seem to be happy,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlobal 200 Firms Gaining Deal Share Amid Race to Build in India
Trending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250