Where the Girls Are
The good news: Women constitute the majority of law students. The bad news: Women dominate some of the worst-ranked law schools in the nation.
March 16, 2018 at 01:26 PM
4 minute read
I don't know whether to celebrate or go into a funk.
First, let me give you what appears to be the good news: For the second year in a row, women constitute the majority of law students. Based on 2017 data, women make up 51.3 percent of enrollees. We've crossed the 50 percent mark! Hooray!
But if you think women now dominate the top schools—as I had assumed—you'd be disappointed. According to Enjuris, a site about personal injury law (side note: female personal injury lawyers also have a tough time competing against men), women have not cracked the 50 percent mark at most top law schools.
In fact, among the top 20 law schools, only six schools boast enrollment of more than 50 percent women:
- Berkeley
- Georgetown
- NYU
- Northwestern
- UCLA
- Vanderbilt
Another interesting tidbit: Duke has the lowest female enrollment (41.3 percent) among the top schools, even though Vanderbilt, another prominent Southern school, has more than 50 percent women.
Not so surprising, perhaps, is that the law school with the rock-bottom female enrollment is Brigham Young University (36.2 percent), which is more than 90 percent Mormon. Though women have averaged only 30 percent of the applicant pool over the last five years, BYU Law's admissions director Stacie Stewart said, “Each year we have trended up,” adding that she expects “a balanced class within the next two to three years.”
And despite the conservative Mormon culture, Stewart said, ”We definitely aggressively recruit women.” The trend, she said, is that Mormon women are marrying later and having kids later like women in the rest of the country.
BYU is an anomaly in many respects, but what's really troubling to me is where you'll find the highest percentage of female law students. Women dominate some of the worst-ranked (or unranked) law schools in the nation. With the notable exception of Berkeley, the schools with 60 percent or more women are the bottom-feeders to avoid, including Atlanta's John Marshall Law School, District of Columbia, Golden Gate University, Florida A&M University, North Carolina Central University, New England Law, City University of New York, Texas Southern University, Inter American University of Puerto Rico, Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico and Western New England University.
“For whatever reason women are more willing to accept offers from, and invest in, lower-ranked schools than men are,” said law school application consultant Anna Ivey, a former lawyer and University of Chicago admissions director. “That's not always a wise decision, given bar passage rates, employment prospects and heavy debt burdens.”
To say it's not a wise decision is much too subtle. Permit me to be blunt: If you assume a heavy debt to attend a crummy law school, you are foolish.
But let's not end on a depressing note. Let's look at Berkeley, the shining example of a top school that's attracting a huge number of women. What's its secret sauce?
“We have not taken any specific actions to recruit women to Berkeley Law,” said Kristin Theis-Alvarez, the assistant dean of admissions. Since 2013, Berkeley “began to receive more applications from women than from men”—a trend that continues to increase. She added that women might be attracted to the school because of the high number of female faculty “who may serve as mentors.” Another reason she cited is the school's liberal vibe: “We recognize many female or female-identified applicants have intersectional identities.
It all sounds very Berkeleyesque. But, hey, who am I to argue with success?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Feds Chide Defense Attorney Alex Spiro for Extrajudicial Comments in NYC's Adams Case
- 2These Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
- 3‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
- 4'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
- 5Energy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250