A Look at What's in Store for GE's In-House Counsel After UnitedLex Deal
William Deckelman, general counsel of DXC Technology, drew on his own recent experiences with UnitedLex to tell Corporate Counsel what GE's legal department might be in for after inking the agreement.
March 22, 2018 at 05:26 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Photo: Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock.com
Talk about disruption. The almost legendary legal department at General Electric Co.—where general counsel Ben Heineman Jr. reigned for 18 years and enshrined the “lawyer-statesperson” model—is innovating once again.
In a move certain to shake up GE's in-house counsel structure, UnitedLex, an Overland Park, Kansas-based legal services company, said Thursday that GE has signed a multiyear contract to expand its use of UnitedLex's services. The move will reduce Boston-based GE's legal spend by 30 percent, according to the announcement, while greatly enhancing the legal team's digital processing across the globe.
Although neither company would discuss personnel moves or dollar amounts, the deal is expected to save GE between $40 and $50 million and allow it to repurpose as many as 75 lawyers, with some of those transitioning to UnitedLex, one person familiar with the deal told The American Lawyer, a sibling publication of Corporate Counsel.
On Thursday, Corporate Counsel asked William Deckelman, executive vice president and general counsel of DXC Technology Co., which made a larger scale but similar deal with UnitedLex last December, whether that partnership has met his expectations.
“We've actually exceeded them,” Deckelman said. “I am a believer.” UnitedLex delivered on its promise of a 30 percent savings, and more, he said.
DXC expects to save $1 billion overall, with additional savings over the next five years. The company was able to implement a new digital contracting solution that can process more than 65 million contracts per year, as well as a central hub for all department communications, such as project management initiatives, training materials, and team calendars. New technology also helps with global monitoring, reporting and management of outside counsel spend.
Deckelman acknowledged the change was a culture shock that required a lot of communication, both with his superiors and his legal team.
Before the contract, DXC had around 525 lawyers, he said. Now it has 125. Another 225 lawyers “rebadged” and joined UnitedLex, but still work with DXC.
“We are doing the same amount of high-quality work with 40 percent fewer resources,” he said. “The productivity is much greater than I even expected.” The lawyers did not take salary cuts at UnitedLex, he added.
A few in-house attorneys quit, rather than join UnitedLex, he said, but there was no major attrition. “This is not for everyone,” Deckelman explained. “People have different aspirations in their careers, but by and large I think the team is happy and engaged and energetic.”
He said he has not received one phone call from a disgruntled employee.
The reason the Tysons Corner, Virginia, company can now do more and do it for less is because UnitedLex has “the technology platforms, the process discipline and the project management discipline to run that kind of operation,” Deckelman said. “They are very focused.”
The change has worked well for most in-house attorneys, he said, because it's opened up a new world of opportunities for them. “They are seeing best practices not just here but in the entire market, and they see a career trajectory with long-term alternatives,” he said.
Deckelman also believes the attorneys are on the leading edge of a new wave in digital lawyering that will overtake the profession in the next three to five years.
“Their best opportunity to prepare is with UnitedLex,” he said. “I'm excited for our people to have that opportunity.”
Deckelman also welcomed the UnitedLex deal with GE, and said he doesn't feel that it will impinge on his client relationship with UnitedLex. If anything, he thinks it might help his legal team.
“I've known and worked with Dan [Daniel Reed, CEO of UnitedLex] for a long time and feel we have a close client relationship. I've spoken with the GE people as well, and we've talked about whether some more scale and collaboration would be good, within reason.”
Some of that collaboration will be up to GE's new legal chief. After having two general counsel since Heineman left the company in 2005, GE will get a third in April, when Michael Holston, formerly a general counsel at Merck & Co. and Hewlett-Packard, takes the reins.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMintz Hires Manatt's Data Privacy Leader, 2 Colleagues in Boston Expansion
DLA Piper Adds AI, Data Analytics Practice with Ex-Faegre Drinker Team
Gibson Dunn Adds Apple Chief Privacy Officer as Big Tech Faces 'Novel, Unprecedented' Data Use Restrictions
Akerman Debuts Data Center and Digital Infrastructure Practice With Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Laterals
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250