ABA Rules Aim to Help Lawyers Boast Responsibly
“When you win big, you have to be out there,” says Seward & Kissel's Rita Glavin. But there are limits to using a win for one client to reel in others.
March 27, 2018 at 03:31 PM
3 minute read
There's no better marketing tactic for litigators than a big courtroom victory. But as a recent opinion by the American Bar Association's standing committee on ethics and professional responsibility makes clear, there are limits to using a win for one client in order to attract others.
Rita Glavin of Seward & Kissel knows that success can beget success. Glavin represented former Dewey & LeBoeuf executive director Stephen DiCarmine, winning his acquittal last year on charges that included securities fraud and conspiracy.
“When you win big, you have to be out there,” said Glavin, whose successful defense of DiCarmine prompted dozens of stories in the legal and the mainstream press. “Your name becomes much more well-known,” she said. “When clients are considering you, they know what your work has been.”
With existing clients, Glavin added, winning an acquittal like that “reinforces your credibility and skills.”
Lawyers should seize such victories as marketing opportunities, said Gina Rubel, CEO of Furia Rubel Communications. But they should follow some basic ground rules that have gotten more specific with the recent ABA opinion.
“If a lawyer comes to me and says we won this big case, and how should we capitalize on it, the very first thing if they are going to do any publicity they need is to have written consent from the client,” Rubel said.
The ABA ethics committee's March 6 opinion states that a client must give express or implied consent to disclose any information at all about a client matter or representation, even if the information is already part of the public record.
The opinion outlines how a lawyer's “public commentary” implicates three ethics rules: Rules 1.6 (confidentiality), 3.5 (impartiality/decorum of tribunal), and 3.6 (trial publicity). The ethics committee took a broad view on what should be considered public commentary, and included online publications, web postings, tweets, webinars, podcasts, and in printed magazines, white papers and law review articles.
Once lawyers have their clients' consent, however, they should talk or write publicly about the assignment—especially if it led to dropped charges or to an exoneration. By doing so, they are acting in the client's best interests, as well as marketing their own talents, Rubel said.
“Get the positive news out there as much as possible. They are helping clean up a digital footprint for their client,” she said.
White-collar criminal defense victories have particular potential for client development.
“Winning this case has definitely gotten me calls I wouldn't have gotten before,” said David Siegal, a New York partner at Haynes and Boone who successfully beat back civil and criminal fraud claims against Wall Street financier Benjamin Wey last year, and then won a related victory for Wey's sister this month.
“We beat not just the SEC but the Southern District prosecutors,” Siegal said.
Soon after the Justice Department dropped its case against Wey last August, Siegal's phone began ringing with prospective clients, he said. “I probably received six or seven calls, and I have added at least one significant client in the financial services business that probably is a seven-figure representation,” Siegal said.
Siegal said he's also been invited to speak frequently at events, including nationally. “It's not as if business has exploded, but there are intangible ways in which this win helps. People's confidence in referring matters has grown,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1‘BiT Global Lost’: Federal Judge Won’t Stop Coinbase From Delisting wBTC Token
- 2Some Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
- 3Judge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
- 4EPA grants California authority to ban sales of new gas cars by 2035. Action faces reversal by Trump
- 5US to pay nearly $116M to settle lawsuits over rampant sexual abuse at California women's prison
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250