Trump's Lawyers in Waiting, Low-Brow Lohan + More!
It turns out there are some very well-credentialed young legal talents who are all progeny of Trump loyalists.
March 27, 2018 at 04:48 PM
5 minute read
|
Yes, it's that time again: Our news and gossip edition.
Future Trump lawyers: The fabulous, glamorous trio. We know President Donald Trump is having a hard time hiring lawyers to represent him. But despair no more! Help is on the way.
It turns out there are some very well-credentialed young legal talents waiting in the wings—and they are all progeny of Trump loyalists. There is, of course, POTUS' own daughter Tiffany Trump, who's a 1-L at Georgetown University Law Center. And, hiding in plain sight, as Law.com's Karen Sloan revealed last week, is Vice President Mike Pence's daughter Audrey Pence, a first-year at Yale Law School. Now, Above the Law's Staci Zaretsky has uncovered another gem: McKenna Pruitt, daughter of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt, is a first-year at the University of Virginia School of Law.
Of course, we have no idea if these women share their fathers' politics. Aside from her speech at the Republican convention, Tiffany Trump has been pretty quiet. Meanwhile Pence's daughter Audrey is reportedly a political independent and a social liberal. (Whoa, does that mean she's not a believer in conversion therapy for gays?)
Of the three, Pruitt's daughter might be the strongest party loyalist. A graduate of the University of Oklahoma (where she was a cheerleader), she was a member of the Young Republicans Club. Plus, she interned at the White House Counsel's Office last year, presumably under the tutelage of Don McGahn.
In any case, they all seem to be bright, comely young women—the type Trump likes so much (they might remind him of Ivanka Trump, except for Tiffany). And while they might not have much experience, who cares? Trump has always been very generous about putting the young or inexperienced (or both) in key positions.
This is when you know your movie career is in the toilet. I know Lindsay Lohan is having a hard time making a comeback in Hollywood, but can she be so desperate? The answer is apparently yes. The one-time star of “Mean Girls” is now the spokesperson for Lawyer.com, which connects potential clients with lawyers.
In the promo, Lohan said she was “confused and a little scared” when the site contacted her, “because I thought I was in trouble.” But eventually, “I realized Lawyer.com is just about helping people,” she added. “From getting a DUI—let's not pretend I didn't get one, or two, or three or some others—it's so simple and it's free.”
As Legaltech News reminds us, Lohan has suffered all kinds of legal problems. She's been jailed three times for violating probation “and has been variously charged over the years with battery, theft, leaving the scene of an accident, drug possession and driving without a license”—exactly the type of situations where you might turn to an app to get quick legal help.
There's no question that Lohan is qualified for this job. But how will this gig reboot her deflated acting career? Is there anything remotely sexy about hawking lawyers to the masses?
Maybe it won't jump-start her career. But, hey, at least she's not the celebrity face for Depend adult diapers.
Why is Kirkland & Ellis in the middle of the Bill Voge mess? By now, everyone knows about the fate of Latham & Watkins chair Bill Voge, who resigned from the firm for sexual indiscretions involving a woman he met through a religious organization.
There are many oddities and unanswered questions in the Voge matter, like what exactly happened between Voge and the woman, and how are various Christian organizations involved in the matter. (Voge met the woman when he was trying to facilitate a “Christian reconciliation” between her and a member of the New Canaan Society, a Christian men's group started by a Goldman Sachs partner. Got that?)
There's a weird, cultish quality to the whole matter—and it doesn't help that Latham has been quite opaque about it. But let me focus on a more mundane reference: Did anyone notice that another Big Law firm also made an appearance? That was Kirkland & Ellis, which the woman also contacted in the aftermath. Law360 reports that the woman contacted Voge's lawyer, his family, partners at Latham and lawyers at Kirkland & Ellis to complain about Voge's behavior.
It's more or less logical that she would complain to Latham, but why Kirkland? Is the woman/her spouse a lawyer there? Does Kirkland represent one of the religious groups? (We've asked the firm for comment but have not heard back.)
Inquiring minds would like to know what's going on. It's not everyday that two stellar firms get mentioned in the same tawdry affair.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250