Data-Driven Client Retention Program Wins Fans at DLA Piper
The initiative, which uses predictive analytics to help the firm broaden its relationships with existing clients, is now out of its pilot stage.
April 02, 2018 at 03:50 PM
3 minute read
Marketing experts have long pressed lawyers to genuflect at the altar of existing client relationships, arguing that law firms grow faster and more efficiently by expanding their business with the clients they already have.
It's a lesson that hasn't been lost on the marketing team at DLA Piper, which has begun rolling out an ambitious program aimed at helping its lawyers grow their business. The initiative, which the firm first introduced in pilot form last year, uses internal data to address revenue loss from existing clients and reverse those trends.
So far only a fraction of the firm's 3,600 lawyers are participating. But for those that do, the rewards can be great, according to Barbara Taylor, the firm's U.S. chief marketing officer.
To implement the program, DLA Piper's marketing team gathered and analyzed data about its clients, the work that the firm has done for them, the revenues generated as a result, staffing details, and other variables. The firm used that analysis to identify what led to shrinkage or growth in client relationships, and built a predictive model that spells out what actions lawyers can take with specific clients.
Taylor's team identified four actions as the most effective with the most clients: reducing the legal team serving the client to five lawyers or less; introducing a new lawyer to the team; adding a lawyer who is an expert in the client's industry; and setting up marketing events specifically tailored for the client, such as inviting in-house lawyers to a CLE event sponsored by the firm or sending tailored newsletters.
When they follow through, the firm's lawyers have seen impressive results—such as transforming a 48 percent annual decline in revenues from one existing client into a 14 percent growth spurt, according to Taylor.
The program is not mandatory, and the firm's marketing team has relied on volunteers, Taylor said.
“We are looking for partners interested in working with us,” Taylor said. So far about 100 partners have asked to participate, including from the life sciences, financial services, and Boston-based real estate practices, she said.
“All of this was a change for us, and it did require talking about it and bringing people along. It also required us to be mindful of the fact that we were asking lawyers to do something different,” Taylor said.
“At the beginning, I was like, 'Oh God, another gimmick,'” said partner Ann Ford, a member of the firm's executive committee and U.S. chair of its trademark, copyright and media practice, who was part of the predictive analytics model pilot last year.
Now, she said, “I'm a big believer.”
After she applied the pilot's concepts to her relationships with five of her most significant clients, she had her best year ever, Ford said. No wonder she now has a sign reminding her to follow the program's four actions within sight of her desk.
“It helped me understand the clients better,” she said of the effort. “And you are talking to someone who is—as most lawyers are—cynical.”
The program rewards clients as well, because their costs shrink with the downsizing of the legal teams, even though their legal spend with DLA Piper may increase because they are using the firm for more matters, Ford said.
“They are getting more experienced lawyers,” Ford said. Because the client's relationship with the firm expands, the clients can exert more downward rate pressure without reducing DLA Piper's overall revenues.
“They like that,” Ford said. “It makes it much more of client-law firm partnership.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMintz Hires Manatt's Data Privacy Leader, 2 Colleagues in Boston Expansion
DLA Piper Adds AI, Data Analytics Practice with Ex-Faegre Drinker Team
Gibson Dunn Adds Apple Chief Privacy Officer as Big Tech Faces 'Novel, Unprecedented' Data Use Restrictions
Akerman Debuts Data Center and Digital Infrastructure Practice With Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Laterals
Trending Stories
- 1UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in U.S., Other Countries
- 2Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 36th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 4On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
- 5After Mysterious Parting With Last GC, Photronics Fills Vacancy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250