Akerman Makes a Play for More Middle-Market Private Equity Work
The Am Law 100 firm hopes to seize profitable and growing opportunities for lawyers advising private equity clients with leveraged buyout funds below $1 billion.
April 03, 2018 at 12:34 PM
4 minute read
Akerman's office in Miami.
Akerman, a Florida-based Am Law 100 firm riding a seven-year streak of financial growth, recently introduced its first report about middle-market private equity dealmaking.
The “Akerman PErspectives Report” uses data from Pitchbook.com and tracks “often underreported yet significant activity of the sub-$1 billion and sub-$500 million private equity buyout funds,” according to a statement by the firm.
Overall private equity buyout fundraising for those market sectors has grown, Akerman's analysis concludes. Specifically, the firm's report states that for those sectors more than $154 billion of investment was realized in 2017, a 60 percent increase from the previous year.
Carl Roston, co-chair of Akerman's corporate group, led the team that created the report. Akerman hopes to seize profitable and growing opportunities now emerging for lawyers advising private equity clients that have leveraged buyout funds below $1 billion, Roston said.
Roston expects dealmaking by middle-market private equity firms to continue growing in 2018. One of the reasons that Roston is optimistic about such an uptick is what he calls “heightened interest in Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code, which allows PE funds to avoid the 23.8 percent federal capital gains tax on dispositions of qualified portfolio companies.”
That new tax wrinkle is especially useful for making profitable more modest-sized deals. And so what does the potential robustness of the middle-market private equity sector mean for Big Law? Potentially more business for firms that are not at the top of the Am Law 100, Roston said.
“Clients are looking for lawyers who are doing a high volume of transactional work who are very much interested and dedicated to this sector of the market,” Roston said. “Private equity clients want high volume complex LBO work and they are also insisting on a level of client service and continuity of staff.”
Such demands from those types of private equity clients create opportunities for Akerman, Roston said. The firm is not, he concedes, in the top tier in terms of private equity deals for leveraged buyout funds with more than $1 billion. Those deals typically go to firms such as Debevoise & Plimpton or Kirkland & Ellis (the latter of which raided Debevoise in December for its former funds head), both of which consistently place in the top ranks of private equity advisers, Roston said.
But Akerman has hired lateral partners from those firms who have both the sophistication and willingness to work deals beneath the $1 billion threshold for leveraged buyout funds. Akerman's private equity clients have the advantage of working repeatedly with the same teams of lawyers often led by individuals with experience working on bigger deals, Roston said.
“We are seeing an opportunity for firms that are not in the Am Law 20 but that have that level of sophistication to grow in this sector of the market,” Roston said.
Akerman, a 631-lawyer firm known for launching innovative new products, did recently see a group of Chicago-based lawyers break away to form their own boutique. But Akerman has kept growing, recently bolting on a six-lawyer shop in South Florida and hiring corporate and private equity lawyers in Austin, Texas, where Akerman opened an office in 2016 after absorbing a group of 30 lawyers from dissolving local firm Beirne, Maynard & Parsons.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 2Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 3Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 4Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 5UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250