Longford Bags Jenner & Block Partner While Spending From $500M Purse
After a decade in Big Law, Justin Maleson is joining the increasingly lucrative world of litigation finance.
April 16, 2018 at 03:35 PM
4 minute read
Chicago-based litigation funder Longford Capital Management LP, having spent nearly half of the $500 million financing round it closed in September, on Monday announced it had hired a Jenner & Block partner to help find cases worth backing.
Justin Maleson, a 10-year veteran of the Am Law 100 firm's vaunted litigation department, said he joined Longford in the Windy City as a result of a connection between Jenner & Block litigation chairman Craig Martin and Longford co-founder William Farrell Jr.
Farrell said he told Martin that Longford was looking to hire partners from “comfortable” positions within law firms before Martin helped facilitate a meeting between Maleson and Farrell, a managing director and general counsel at the fund who previously served as a partner at Chicago-based Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg.
Maleson said he was enticed to join a litigation funder for a few reasons. He had seen it used in his own practice and believed it would grow as a way to help clients and large law firms work together more smoothly. And it was a way for him to put to work a marketing major stemming from his days as an undergraduate at the University of Maryland.
“This was a perfect way for me to utilize my legal training and my business training,” said Maleson, who joined Jenner & Block in 2008 after graduating from the University of New Hampshire School of Law.
After launching nearly four years ago with a $56.5 million fund, Longford said in September that it had raised $500 million in new capital.
Farrell said Maleson's corporate litigation background was something that Longford had been looking for after hiring bankruptcy and intellectual property partners. Longford picked up Paul Hastings of counsel Marc Carmel in Chicago last June to help it break into the bankruptcy arena. That move followed the firm's recruitment of Nixon Peabody IP litigation leader Russell Genet in February and expansion into the Bay Area in late 2016.
Those lawyers help Longford vet cases for potential investment. Farrell said Monday that his firm has put nearly half of its $500 million funding round toward new cases.
Farrell said Longford was able to spend the money this quickly because of “ever-increasing demand” for litigation funding by large law firms and boutiques alike. Longford has also developed sales lines directly into corporate legal departments, Farrell said, something he hopes that Maleson will be helpful in pushing forward.
“Justin has a commercial litigation focus, so we are just trying to build out our team to sufficiently respond to the inquiries we are getting,” Farrell said. “And Justin will be an important part of that.”
Another funder that has recently raised money, Therium Group Holdings Ltd., made a new addition on April 13 by bringing aboard investment associate Elly Brindle. She had previously been an associate at Boies Schiller Flexner in London.
Brindle has a long history in high-stakes litigation, including representing Apple Inc. in its global antitrust battle with Qualcomm Inc. She also represented Midtown Acquisitions Group LP in a multijurisdiction judgment enforcement against Essar Global Fund Ltd.
U.K.-based Therium, which sought to expand stateside last summer, announced in February that it had raised $287 million with an expectation to raise another $143 million. (The American Lawyer reported late last year on Therium's work in a Nigerian dispute involving energy giant Chevron Corp.)
The rising tide of litigation finance in the U.S., which has also resulted in new outfits going live such as Curiam Capital LLC and Haybeach Partners LLC, has not been met without opposition. Earlier this month, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce successfully backed a new Wisconsin law that requires the disclosure of litigation funding agreements in state court cases.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250