Some Big Law Firms Applaud as Clients Get Tougher on Diversity
More clients are going beyond data on demographics to gauge their law firms' diversity efforts.
April 27, 2018 at 02:28 PM
4 minute read
When it comes to promoting diversity among their outside lawyers, more and more clients are demanding that firms show, not just tell.
At 2,685-lawyer Hogan Lovells, the pace of client requests for demographic details about the firm's diversity has picked up and intensified since last year.
According to Leslie Richards-Yellen, who is director of inclusion for Hogan Lovells in the Americas, 47 clients requested diversity demographics from the firm in the first quarter of 2018—nearly double the 25 requests over the same period last year.
“We now have one person dedicated to filling out RFPs and client surveys about this,” Richards-Yellen said. She rates the increasing number of requests as good news. “We are delighted with the focus on diversity,” she said.
The growing attention on the issue has helped hone Richards-Yellen's notions of what client questions trigger the most meaningful responses. She and other lawyers focused on diversity say surveys that capture a snapshot of a firm's demographics—like what percentage of the workforce are women, underrepresented minorities and LGBTQ—provide just a starting point.
To really understand a firm's commitment, she said, clients need to go further, with questions like: “What kinds of work are people doing?”
Richards-Yellen said more clients are beginning to request the prospective roles and likely hours logged by specific members of a legal team proposed in a RFP, so they can gauge if a minority or female lawyer is being pitched as leader, a true participant—or just a token.
Sharon Nelles, a New York partner at 812-lawyer Sullivan & Cromwell, agrees clients need to delve deeper when they want to learn about diversity progress at their outside firms. Nelles helped roll out a program established by JPMorgan Chase & Co. earlier this year that requires 50 percent of the bank's outside litigation teams to be led by women or underrepresented minorities.
“A law firm's commitment to, and success with, diversity efforts cannot be revealed by a numbers snapshot,” Nelles said in an email.
“Statistics may make for easy comparisons across points in time, or across firms, but cannot measure culture,” Nelles said. “Clients can support diversity efforts by asking firms to dive deeper, thus establishing that this is not a numbers game.”
For example, Nelles said, clients can ask for the makeup of the teams currently working for them; what's being done to make specific client teams and the firms as a whole more diverse; and how those programs impact client service.
“Then follow-up. I am happy to tell you our numbers. I would rather tell you about our diverse lawyers. I would prefer even more to have those lawyers meet with you and partner with you to develop lasting relationships, which is what ultimately will push up the numbers,” Nelles added.
Due Diligence
One Hogan Lovells' client, Florida-based NextEra Energy Resources, definitely dug deeper after the firm submitted an RFP to the company. In its bid, Hogan Lovells had identified David Mitchell, a fifth-year associate who is African-American, as a lawyer who would work on the team if the firm won the work.
According to Richards-Yellen and Mitchell, Bobbie King, a senior attorney at NextEra, then stepped in to do some due diligence on the firm's diversity claims. King called Mitchell and asked if he knew about the RFP bid—and if he anticipated he really would be doing the work if NextEra awarded it to Hogan Lovells.
Mitchell and King, a former Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom associate, had known each other; they both are members of The Society of 1844, a group of about 60 African-American male lawyers, mostly working at big New York firms and Fortune 500 companies. The group is named after the year that Macon Bolling Allen, the first black lawyer in the United States, was admitted to practice law in Maine, and members meet monthly, according to Mitchell. (King declined to comment for this story because of his company's policies limiting contact with the press.)
King wanted to know if including Mitchell on the RFP was about “just putting someone's name or face on a pitch,” Mitchell said. King peppered him with questions, Mitchell recalled: Who would be supervising Mitchell on this deal? How was Mitchell's overall experience with that partner's prior supervision? He could answer those questions positively, Mitchell said.
“Folks at these companies, when they are asking for diverse teams, they are going to start to investigate,” Mitchell said, adding that he made sure to tell his supervising partners and Richards-Yellen about his exchange with King.
Richards-Yellen said she was elated to know a client had dug that deep. And, no surprise, Hogan Lovells won the work.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Am Law 50's Runaway Rates Put Onus on Legal Departments to Stiffen Resistance
4 minute readSenior Partners Approach $3,000 an Hour, As More Billing Rate Hikes Expected in 2025
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 4Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
- 5Friday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250