Looking Behind the Numbers in The Am Law 200 Rankings
The Am Law 200 results tell an interesting, complex story. We will examine what the results mean for that market segment and the firms around it.
May 10, 2018 at 09:23 PM
2 minute read
The results of our Am Law 200 ranking will be released May 22 and offer up some fascinating insights into the health of a market segment that is experiencing different realities from its Am Law 100 brethren.
The American Lawyer and ALM Intelligence will host a webinar analyzing the results and what it means for the market moving forward. You can sign up for the free webinar here. The webinar will be held Tuesday, May 22 at 1 p.m. EST.
The Am Law 200 rankings paint a much different picture of the health of that group of firms as compared with the financial success of the first 100 highest-grossing law firms in the United States. The list saw more volatility when it came to new entrants and those who dropped off. But a closer look at the numbers shows a lot of strong performances across the Second Hundred. This webinar will examine what led to the shakeup, what removing certain outliers does to the overall picture of the Second Hundred's financial stability and how a certain group of firms was able to succeed in a market typically cast as trailing behind the Am Law 100.
All of this will be put into context of what we can expect next year across the Am Law 100 and 200 as well as what this means for the NLJ 200-500 firms. Nicholas Bruch, senior analyst with ALM Intelligence, and Marcie Borgal Shunk, founder of The Tilt Institute, will join The American Lawyer editor in chief, Gina Passarella, to discuss the results.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Change Is Coming With the New Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
6 minute read
After Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute read
Big Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
