Reed Smith 'Innovation Hours' Program Gives Credit for Non-Client Work
The newly adopted initiative gives attorneys up to 50 hours of billable hour credits for putting time in new innovations.
May 15, 2018 at 03:09 PM
4 minute read
Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
In the latest sign that Big Law firms are working to embrace innovation, Reed Smith is rolling out a new program that lets lawyers earn billable hour credits for time they spend promoting advances in legal technology and operations.
The firm launched a pilot version of the “Innovation Hours” program last year, with 17 lawyers dedicating 364 hours to six selected projects. This year, the firm will sign off on even more projects, while also flagging five particular client-facing endeavors for added support.
“We had a lot of people wanting to engage in new technologies, process improvement, and new ways of working,” said Reed Smith chief knowledge officer Lucy Dillon. “Being able to give people billing credit was the breakthrough way to say to people, 'We really value your ideas and we want you to have the time and to be rewarded for the time to think things through.'”
The move comes as firms are competing for talent with the rising tech sector and legal industry disrupters, and looking to make their practice appealing to millennials. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, for example, has established its own innovation contest encouraging associates to pitch new business ideas, but Reed Smith's version is open to lawyers at all levels.
For the inaugural effort last year, Dillon and Innovation Hub manager Alex Smith, who are both based in London, culled six ideas from a total of 30 submissions. Each lawyer involved was encouraged to put up to 50 “innovation hours” towards their billing targets.
Kari Larsen, global co-head of Reed Smith's fintech practice, brought together a team of attorneys for one project: the production of an authoritative white paper on blockchain. U.S. attorneys were joined by lawyers from Singapore, Beijing, Hong Kong and the U.K. in drafting the report, which takes on subjects including data privacy, insurance and capital markets.
“With having the hours, we were able to recruit various experts in the fields from around the firm,” she said.
Another project led to the successful launch of the firm's new Breach RespondeRS app, a free tool that simplifies the application of the patchwork of U.S. state laws to let companies focus on protecting data.
Other efforts involved teams in the United States, Europe and Asia working on the automation of contracts and documents; a review of databases of previous cases and outcomes to identify trends in the managed care industry; and work with a fintech startup on a new technology model.
Dillon said she was pleased with the seriousness and maturity with which all participants—who included associates, partners and of counsel—handled the work. There was no overbilling or wasted hours.
“They came, put a business case forward and had to articulate what they hoped to achieve,” she said. “It was very well-managed.”
For 2018, there's no cap on the number of projects that will be approved, but Dillon will prioritize certain ideas and work closely with practice group leaders to ensure they work.
“I want to make sure there's rigor around the projects that we support,” she said.
Five projects that have direct impact on the firm's clients will get special attention. They'll be part of a fast-track, 12-week program where an extra level of support will come from Smith and consulting firm Janders Dean.
The announcement comes on the heels of Reed Smith's establishment of a legal technology program for select summer associates in both the United States and the U.K. Five law school students—three in the United States and two in the U.K.—will spend part of their summers developing projects that use tech to improve legal services.
➤➤ Want more reporting on the evolving legal industry? Check out The Law Firm Disrupted, a weekly email briefing from Law.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Datasite's Ethics and Compliance Team Drives Transformation
- 2$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 3OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 4Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 5Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250