Law Firm Survey Says Millennial Era Is Here, But Change Has Just Begun
Millennials already outnumber any other generation in the legal industry, and a new report says the pace of change will only quicken as their numbers and influence grow.
May 18, 2018 at 11:28 AM
4 minute read
Millennials now make up the largest generational group of attorneys in the U.S., and a new study finds that they are poised to bring about an unprecedented change to a traditionally static legal industry.
A new report by global real estate services firm Cushman & Wakefield, in collaboration with ALM and Law.com, found that as millennials make their way through the ranks at law firms, their demands for change in their work environment will recast how firms structure their compensation, real estate decisions, information technology and flextime policies.
Millennials now account for 43 percent of attorneys, outnumbering Gen Xers and baby boomers in the legal industry, the study found.
“By 2025, over 50 percent of attorneys practicing law in the United States will be millennials,” said Sherry Cushman, executive managing director of the legal sector advisory group at Cushman & Wakefield.
The priorities of millennial associates are much different than older generations, and as more and more millennials assume partnership positions their preferences will start to reshape the legal industry, Cushman said.
“[Their] top 5 [priorities], other than money or compensation, are all about warm, fuzzy things—a collegial work environment, work-life balance, mentoring, and exposure to clients,” Cushman said.
For example, law firms are redesigning their offices in response to millennial demands for flextime and collaborative spaces. The study found that 17 percent of respondents have already moved to single-size offices for all attorneys. A third of the nearly 500 law firm managing partners and decision-makers surveyed for the report said they expected to go completely virtual over the next 10 years, with nearly three-quarters of respondents saying they will achieve below 500 square feet per attorney in their offices.
“For the younger generation, they still want a private office, but it can be much smaller,” Cushman said. “They're more driven by what the environment feels like, how it creates a better mentoring environment.”
Cushman noted that an estimated 30 percent of equity partners are currently approaching retirement, and she said a few law firms will now even forgo a senior partner vote on a 15-year lease simply because the decision will affect millennial associates more so than its aging equity partnership.
“They're saying this decision is not about us. It's about our future generation and legacy and succession plan, and we shouldn't even vote,” Cushman said. “On the other hand, there's still a majority of the firms that are letting the older generation dominate a bit more.”
Of course, it isn't solely millennials that are responsible for the intense pace of change. Their demands are also coming at a time of transformative change in the use of technology in the profession, globalization and fee-structure concerns.
“These are all things that are really impacting the speed at which things are changing,” Cushman said.
In 2017, there were 120 law firm mergers, one of the busiest years for combinations since the Great Recession, Cushman noted. Of those, 52 were cross-border. She also noted that 80 percent of law firms reported positive profits last year. But she also said it's often the case that firms hold themselves back from greater success.
“Whether you're a big firm, small firm or a one-off firm, a lot of the biggest issues for a firm is themselves—is internally being able to build consensus to effect change,” Cushman said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChanges at the Top: How 'Different Leadership Skills' Are Prevailing in Big Law
Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250