California Was No Bear Market in 2017
From San Francisco to Silicon Beach, the Golden State was golden for Second Hundred firms.
May 22, 2018 at 09:36 AM
5 minute read
As California's legal market saw an uptick in gross revenue and demand last year, with a half-dozen firms with Bay Area roots landing on the Am Law 100, a rebound in the Los Angeles market and a surging economy helped the Golden State fill Am Law 200 coffers.
At least a dozen firms, the bulk of them based in Southern California, secured spots on the Second Hundred list this year. But no firm was higher than Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, which has been on a nationwide expansion spree in recent months. The firm, whose roots are in San Francisco, rose to No. 104 on the Second Hundred rankings after reaping $331.2 million in gross revenue last year, up 11.7 percent from 2016.
“California is largely driven by growth and profitability in the tech space, and a lot of the firms are right in the tail of that growth,” says Gordon Rees managing partner Dion Cominos, adding that other industries such as construction, infrastructure and health care bolster the bottom lines of local firms.
California, if it were an independent country, would have the world's fifth-largest economy, so there is often no single contributing factor that influences every firm, save for the fact that as the West Coast goes, so does the national economy.
Other California firms making the Second Hundred this year are Manatt, Phelps & Phillips (106); Loeb & Loeb (107); Munger, Tolles & Olson (127); Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear (133); Irell & Manella (156); Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis (160); Buchalter (175); Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch (189); Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell (193); and Rutan & Tucker (198).
Among those firms, six climbed in the rankings. Gordon Rees, the only one based outside Southern California, topped all of them. Sedgwick, a San Francisco-based Am Law 200 firm that dissolved this past January, has disappeared from the list.
“I think the economy in California overall has strengthened, and as a result not only are we seeing the boom in Northern California, but it is also translating into Southern California,” says Avis Caravello, who has run her own San Francisco-based legal recruiting firm for the past 30 years.
As the Los Angeles legal market has gradually recovered from the financial crisis, Caravello says firms in the region have watched their financial growth pick up, which in turn helps attract more talent with competitive mid-market rates.
“I think there is an increase and growing demand for rate relief in certain practice areas,” Caravello says. “That kind of mid-market work and mid-market rate is in many ways reflective of the strength of some of the indigenous Los Angeles firms.”
Orange County-based Buchalter made a return to the list this year thanks to its $133 million in gross revenue in 2017.
“We felt there is a place in the market for a strong regional law firm,” says Buchalter president and CEO Adam Bass. He adds that his firm has also benefited from its rate-driven revenue growth and increased head count. “We think that we offer competitive rates. We offer a value proposition for our clients in the rate structure that is fair and competitive—and substantially lower than a lot of the national competitors.”
Furthermore, the growing technology scene in the so-called Silicon Beach has also shifted the economic tides of Los Angeles, attracting more clients and lawyers to the area.
“Los Angeles is the focus of the entertainment industry and the booming area called Silicon Beach. Those two areas, in particular, are the one that we saw growth in,” says Sandra Seville-Jones, who serves as co-managing partner of Munger Tolles, which saw its revenue rise slightly to $236.3 million.
Jeffer Mangels and Rutan & Tucker both slipped a bit financially last year. Rutan & Tucker managing partner William Meehan says 2017 was a disappointment for his Orange County-based firm, only due to its “exceptionally good” 2016. But he's optimistic about the firm's prospects this year.
“With the economy being strong, the need for lawyers remains strong,“ Meehan says, adding that Rutan & Tucker has seen an uptick in demand for transactional, finance, intellectual property and litigation work. “We hope things continue to trend in a positive direction.“
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAre Counsel Ranks Getting 'Squeezed' as Nonequity and Associate Pay Grows?
5 minute readAI's Place in Big Law Broadens, As Firms Embrace Fresh Uses of the Technology
Trending Stories
- 1With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 2Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 3Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 4Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
- 5Gift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250