D.C.-Based Firms Find Fertile Ground in the Swamp
No Second Hundred firm in Washington saw its partner profits dip last year.
May 22, 2018 at 09:38 AM
4 minute read
The Washington, D.C., legal market capitalized on America's thriving economy and the uncertainty wrought by President Donald Trump's government to boost revenue last year.
Dive into the Am Law 200 data and personalize it based on your firm, peers and trends. Learn More
Among firms ranked in the Second Hundred, Arent Fox, Buckley Sandler and Wiley Rein all showed revenue growth, while Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner effectively stayed flat—slipping 0.2 percent and falling two places in this year's rankings to 107.
No Second Hundred firm in Washington saw its partner profits dip last year, with Arent Fox leading the way yet again. The firm has grown its profits each and every year since 2009, and its financial performance across the board has the firm creeping closer toward the top 100—moving up four spots to 109 this year.
D.C. mainstays in the Am Law 100 performed even stronger in terms of revenue growth in 2017. Covington & Burling, Williams & Connolly and Venable all saw climbing revenues and all rose in the rankings, while Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld recorded strong performances once again. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, fresh off the merger of the legacy D.C. firm and its New York counterpart, saw its revenue rise, too.
“I think all of us have been surprised by just how robust the market is,” says Jeffrey Lowe, Major, Lindsey & Africa managing partner in D.C.
Lowe, a leading national recruiter, says the market appeared to be in a holding pattern after Trump's unexpected win, but things began to take off last year.
Philip West, chairman of Steptoe & Johnson, says the regular rhythms of a market tied closely to the federal government have served Washington lawyers well.
“I think D.C. is a stable and strong legal market to be based in,” West says. “We can count on a fair degree of stability and at least industry-matching, if not above-average, growth.”
The highs may not be as high, he suggests, but there's less volatility in comparison to San Francisco, with its focus on the technology sector, or New York, with its reliance on the capital markets and deals. Even as Steptoe fell two slots to 96 in this year's Am Law 100, West says he remains “cautiously optimistic” about the future.
One sign of Washington's healthy market is a counterpoint to that stability: a frenzy of lateral hiring over the last year or so.
Dive into the Am Law 200 data and personalize it based on your firm, peers and trends. Learn More
Even more than the Trump administration, the volume of lateral partner moves has been the “major disruptive factor” in the D.C. legal market, says Jeff Grossman of Wells Fargo's Legal Specialty Group. Grossman says the pace is at a “greater level than we've ever seen in the past,” with firms also attempting to lure in top talent with higher compensation than ever before.
Partners without a book of business, as is the case with many Washington lawyers and lobbyists who leave government for private practice, are in high demand, too, Grossman notes—especially amid the regulatory, legislative and trade turmoil of the president's first year-and-a-half in office.
Tony Pierce, the partner in charge of Akin Gump's D.C. office, says uncertainty surrounding the new administration drove activity for the firm, and issues of trade, taxation and health care will keep lawyers busy.
Akin Gump, which ranked 29 again on this year's Am Law 100, watched its partner profits soar 13.5 percent, with the firm benefiting from new deals and its lobbying efforts.
Pierce notes that the deregulation brought by the Trump administration has created many new opportunities that Akin Gump is looking to seize. Its offices are set to move from the Dupont Circle neighborhood in 2019, and he says the firm's lobbyists are excited about their new address on K Street, the city's oft-maligned lobbying hub.
“I don't know whether that's a good thing or a pejorative,” Pierce jokes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
'Never Been More Dynamic': Big Law Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readFor Paul Weiss, Progress Means 'Embracing the Uncomfortable Reality'
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
- 2People in the News—Dec. 30, 2024—Pond Lehocky, Buchanan Ingersoll
- 3Orange Belongs to All: U-Haul Suit Argues Rival Public Storage Cannot Claim the Color
- 4Continuing Consolidation: The Biggest Legal Tech M&As of 2024
- 5FTC Announces HSR Final Rulemaking Impacting Premerger Filings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250