The New York Elite Keep Raking in the Big Bucks
More than half of the 17 New York-based firms in the Am Law 200 saw revenue growth of 5 percent or more.
May 22, 2018 at 09:37 AM
4 minute read
Once again outperforming their Am Law 100 peers, most of New York's elite law firms enjoyed solid revenue and profit gains, even if growth was at least partially driven by billing rate hikes amid generally flat demand.
Dive into the Am Law 200 data and personalize it based on your firm, peers and trends. Learn More
To assess the New York law firms that dominate market share over finance, deal-making and litigation, The American Lawyer reviewed last year's financial performance for the same group of 17 homegrown New York firms it has surveyed in past years.
The results: Fewer firms achieved double-digit profit growth than in 2016, but the landscape last year was still rosy. It was the second straight year of solid profit gains at many New York firms. And New York firms again outpaced the revenue and profit growth of the industry, according to Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group figures for 2017.
All 17 firms, except Cravath, Swaine & Moore; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft; and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, posted increases in revenue.
More than half of the 17 firms saw revenue growth of 5 percent or more, and three saw their revenue soar by more than 10 percent: Debevoise & Plimpton, with a gain of 11.8 percent to $822 million; Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, rising 14 percent to $634.9 million; and Willkie Farr & Gallagher, leaping up 11.7 percent to $772 million.
Similarly, all 17 firms saw their profits per equity partner increase, except three: Cleary, Cravath and Davis Polk & Wardwell.
Partner profits for many firms grew faster than revenue: A dozen of the 17 New York firms in the sample saw profits per equity partner increase more than 5 percent. Profits per partner at six firms rose more than 10 percent: Debevoise grew PPP by 17.4 percent to $2.83 million; Fried Frank, by 16.9 percent to $2.94 million; Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, by 10.9 percent to $3.46 million; Weil, Gotshal & Manges, by 17.8 percent to $3.64 million; Willkie, up 13 percent to $2.97 million; and Cadwalader, up 18.6 percent to $2.51 million.
Dive into the Am Law 200 data and personalize it based on your firm, peers and trends. Learn More
Other firms showing healthy profit increases included Kramer Levin, up 8.4 percent to $2.15 million; Schulte Roth & Zabel, up 7 percent to $2.56 million; Shearman & Sterling, up 7 percent to $2.32 million; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, by 6.5 percent to $3.47 million; Sullivan & Cromwell, by 5.5 percent to $4.27 million; and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, up 5.1 percent to $3.68 million.
Among Citi's own sample of 32 New York-headquartered firms, average increases in revenue and profits per equity partner, 4.7 percent and 5.1 percent, respectively, outperformed the industry, according to Gretta Rusanow, head of advisory services at the bank's law firm group,
The robust performances, however, don't mean clients have been knocking down doors for law firm legal services. In fact, total demand for New York firms contracted 0.5 percent, compared with the industry, which saw a 0.7 percent increase, says Rusanow, who analyzed the number of hours logged from Citi's sample of 32 New York-headquartered firms.
Rusanow also points to a wide spread in performance behind the figures, with close to half the firms reporting a demand decline.
Revenue increases were mostly driven by billable rate increases, Rusanow says, noting that New York firms in Citi's sample boosted their rates an average 4.5 percent—higher than the 3.7 percent rate rise for the industry overall. The 4.5 percent figure is also higher than the rate increases that New York firms pushed through in 2016, Rusanow says.
New York firms' realization rate improved 1.4 percent from 2016, Rusanow says, suggesting some easing of pricing pressure in the market.
Analysts from both Citi and Wells Fargo Private Bank's Legal Specialty Group pointed to transactional work, including private equity and mergers and acquisitions, driving firms' growth.
“For many of these firms that are doing the big transactional work … there's a lot of elasticity to the rates,” says Joe Mendola of Wells Fargo. Litigation “has continued to be somewhat of a struggle,” he says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Big Law Expected To Follow Milbank's Lead With Associate Year-End Bonuses
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250