Milbank Boosts Associate Salaries With $190K Starting Pay
“If we didn't do this at some point,” another law firm would have done it first, said Milbank chairman Scott Edelman.
June 04, 2018 at 01:53 PM
4 minute read
Ratcheting up market pressure on associate compensation, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy announced Monday that it will increase its associate salaries across the board by $10,000 or $15,000.
Under the changes, effective July 1 this year, associates in their first, second and third years will see an increase of $10,000, meaning starting salaries at Milbank will be $190,000. Associates in their fourth through eighth years will receive $15,000 more, meaning eighth-year compensation will be set at $330,000. Here are the new salaries for all classes:
- 1st year — $190,000
- 2nd year — $200,000
- 3rd year — $220,000
- 4th year — $250,000
- 5th year — $275,000
- 6th year — $295,000
- 7th year — $315,000
- 8th year — $330,000
Summer associate salaries will also increase, pro rata, under the same scale as first-year associates. The firm announced no plans to broadly change counsel compensation, as Milbank sets compensation for counsel lawyers on an individual basis.
The firm announced the raises to its associates on Monday.
In an interview, Milbank chairman Scott Edelman said, “What we're trying to do is set fair, market-leading compensation for our associates. We're not in a race with other firms, but at the same time, we thought this was an appropriate time for an increase, and we want our associates to know how much they're valued.”
He said the firm wanted to recognize associates' contribution to Milbank's success and its ability to handle high-stakes, complex work. “Our people are our greatest assets. We've been working hard, we've been very busy,” he said. “We're committed to offering compensation at the top of the market.”
The 690-lawyer firm's 2017 financial results mark its fifth straight year of solid growth, according to ALM's reporting. Milbank saw its profits per equity partner rise nearly 11 percent last year to $3.46 million, while its gross revenue rose 7.1 percent to $916.54 million. Revenue per lawyer increased 3 percent to $1.33 million.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore last set the industry standard for associate compensation in 2016, boosting starting pay by $20,000 to $180,000. Milbank and many other firms immediately matched.
“Two years have now gone by, and there is cost-of-living increases and inflation,” Edelman said. “We want to signal to the market that we do want the best, and we're willing to pay for the best, and we think after two years, an additional increase is appropriate.”
“We try to lead the market in terms of associate development and training,” Edelman said, noting the firm's Milbank@Harvard training program. “We didn't see the need to wait for somebody else to make an increase that we think is appropriate.”
“If we didn't do this at some point” soon, another firm would, he said.
When asked whether he expected the increases to put a dent in partner profits, Edelman said, “Any time you raise the cost of your expenses, it's going to have an effect on your profits.” He declined to quantify the increase in expenses the firm will absorb, but Milbank has about 500 associates, so firmwide raises would likely translate to an immediate overhead increase in the mid-seven-figure range.
Edelman said the change would not have “a material effect on firm finances,” adding that he didn't expect partner capital contributions to change.
Milbank's move comes as law firms are heavily competing to attract and retain talented associates—a crucial element in building a large firm's profits and the next generation of lawyers. Just last week, Weil, Gotshal & Manges told associates it will shorten the path to partnership by two years in order to retain more talented associates.
Edelman said Milbank's associate pay raises were not influenced by an external event, and the firm had been considering the salary increases for months.
“The market for the best and the brightest,” he said, “is extremely competitive. There are lots of law firms out there, and we're all competing for some really talented people.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBCLP Enhances Financial Disputes and Investigations Practice With Baker McKenzie Partner
2 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 2Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 3Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 4Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
- 5Gift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250