Ex-Partner Accuses Jones Day of 'Fraternity' Environment, Gender Bias
Jones Day is the latest large law firm to face claims of gender discrimination. Wendy Moore, now a partner at Perkins Coie, alleges in a new suit that her former firm operates as a boys' club and marginalizes women.
June 19, 2018 at 03:47 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Executive compensation lawyer Wendy Moore has accused her former law firm Jones Day of sex discrimination, alleging in a representative action in San Francisco state court that the firm runs as a “fraternity” and maintains a black box pay system that has led to gender disparities.
Moore, who joined Perkins Coie as a partner in Palo Alto earlier this year after about five years at Jones Day, alleges that her former law firm violated California's equal pay law and the state's Labor Code through “systematic gender discrimination in compensation.” The suit was brought as a representative action under the California Private Attorneys General Act on behalf of Moore and other “aggrieved” employees.
“Jones Day operates as a fraternity,” the complaint said. “Male senior partners mentor male associates and assist them in climbing the ranks to partnership. They pass the firm's business through male-centered social events focused on athletics. Female attorneys are treated as second-class citizens. They are not, nor can they be, full members in the fraternity.”
A team from Sanford Heisler Sharp, led by firm chairman David Sanford, represents Moore; Sanford and his firm have also been at the helm of several other recent gender discrimination actions brought against current and former large law firms, including Ogletree, Deakins, Nash Smoak & Stewart, Proskauer Rose and Morrison & Foerster.
A Jones Day spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Among other specific details, Moore's complaint cited a recent financial disclosure from a former Jones Day sixth-year associate who joined the Trump administration. In that government disclosure, the associate listed a salary of $810,000 in 2015—about the same amount that Moore earned as a base salary as an eighth-year partner, according to the complaint.
More generally, the complaint alleged that a “boys club” pervades the culture at Jones Day and that male firm partners often make sexist comments and rate female colleagues based on their physical attractiveness. That environment, the suit alleged, leads female lawyers to be “undervalued and marginalized,” and sets up a “patronage” system in which younger male lawyers receive more business development opportunities and other kinds of support than their female peers.
The suit also takes aim at Jones Day's “black box” pay system, alleging that, as a result of it and the firm's overall male-dominated culture, a small group of influential male partners control all compensation decisions. Lawyers at the firm, meanwhile, are encouraged to refrain from discussing their pay, according to the complaint.
“This system lacks sufficient quality controls, implementation metrics, transparency and oversight,” the complaint said. “Unsurprisingly, the outcome of this system is that these male leaders systematically undervalue female attorneys, pay them less than their male counterparts, and provide no avenues to female attorneys to inquire about their pay, much less learn how to increase it.”
Beyond allegations of a fraternity-like atmosphere and unfair pay, the complaint goes on to allege that Moore faced retaliation after speaking up within Jones Day about gender bias issues.
Although she had raised concerns several times during her tenure at Jones Day, Moore decided to hire Sanford in February after she was told not to come to the firm's all-partner meeting. Moore told the firm on Feb. 22 through her lawyers that she planned to pursue discrimination claims and, just six days later, received a letter saying her partnership had been terminated, according to the complaint. The firm allegedly refused to return some $337,500 in capital contributions Moore had made as a partner, and another $200,000 in compensation that she previously earned.
“Jones Day's message in terminating Wendy could not be clearer,” Sanford said in a statement announcing Moore's complaint against her former firm.
The suit also references the firm's past representation of Donald Trump—who bragged about groping women in an “Access Hollywood” video that surfaced during the 2016 presidential campaign—as a marker of the firm's male-dominated environment.
“Ms. Moore raised serious concerns about the firm's misogynist culture and its impact on her career, as well as the firm's support for now-President Donald Trump, a former firm client who has boasted about 'grab[bing women] by the pussy,' only to defend this comment as 'locker room talk,'” the complaint said. “Ms. Moore's complaints of gender discrimination were ultimately the cause of Jones Day's decision to terminate her.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBCLP Enhances Financial Disputes and Investigations Practice With Baker McKenzie Partner
2 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250