Who's on Deck?: The A-List Runners-Up
These firms could be on next year's A-List with some small improvements.
July 24, 2018 at 03:01 PM
6 minute read
And if the list were longer… These 20 firms were close to making it on our annual A-List ranking. With some small changes to certain scores, we could see them there next year. Here are the 20 runners up to the A-List.
21. Steptoe & Johnson LLP. Moving up by 12 spots, Steptoe saw improvement in multiple categories. The firm had a 32-point jump in associate satisfaction to a score of 95, and a six-point rise in female equity partners. Still, its diversity score has room to improve (now 49).
22. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (tie). Gibson Dunn dropped off the A-List this year, tumbling 17 spots in the rankings, all the way from fifth. The firm's female equity partner score dropped from 46 to 0 because it did not provide data. Gibson Dunn performed best in associate satisfaction (99), and pro bono (97.5).
22. Irell & Manella (tie). A score of 91 in associate satisfaction (after a 0 last year for not completing the survey) helped Irell move up 19 spots to 22nd. The firm saw improvement in every category except pro bono, where it had a 22-point drop to a score of 77.
24. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (tie). Cleary Gottlieb moved up two places, with its largest improvement coming in its associate satisfaction score, which rose by 9.5 points. However, the firm did see a 7.5-point drop in RPL, giving it a score of 72.5 points.
24. Crowell & Moring (tie). Moving up by six spots to 24th, Crowell & Moring saw a 14.5-point improvement in associate satisfaction (now 83.5), and raised its diversity score to 76.5. Still, the firm has room to improve in multiple categories, such as female equity partners (now 68.5).
26. Buckley Sandler. Buckley Sandler jumped up 25 spots to place 26th, due to large improvements in RPL and female equity partners, and a score of 64 in associate satisfaction after not completing the survey last year. While the firm saw a four-point improvement in diversity, it still maintains a subpar score of 45.5.
27. Davis Polk & Wardwell. Despite small decreases in three categories, Davis Polk moved up five places in the overall rankings, primarily because of an eight-point increase in pro bono, and a five-point increase in the female equity partners category.
28. Fenwick & West. Fenwick dropped seven spots to place 28th this year. Even though the firm saw a 10.5-point increase in associate satisfaction, it also saw decreases in multiple categories, including a 10-point drop in female equity partners.
29. Hughes Hubbard & Reed. A 16.5-point improvement in its diversity score (now 80) was not enough to keep Hughes Hubbard from dropping 10 spots this year. The firm saw declining scores in RPL, associate satisfaction, pro bono and female equity partners.
30. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips. Manatt dropped 15 places this year, falling off the A-List and placing at 30th. While the firm did see an increase in RPL, it also saw a 14-point drop in associate satisfaction, along with a 13.5-point drop in the female equity partners category.
31. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer. Appearing for the first time on this list, Arnold & Porter scored an impressive 91.5 in the pro bono category. However, with more subpar scores of 62.5 in associate satisfaction and 65.5 in diversity, there is still room for improvement.
32. Cooley. Cooley dropped by six spots to place 32nd this year. While the firm did see improvements in pro bono (63.5), RPL (86) and female equity partners (81), it also saw a decrease in associate satisfaction by 15.5 points, along with a minor decrease in diversity.
33. Winston & Strawn. Despite a 10-point decrease in associate satisfaction, Winston & Strawn moved up from 38th to 33rd in the rankings. The firm saw a 15.5-point rise in female equity partners, along with a nine-point rise in diversity (now 63).
34. Dechert (tie). Dechert climbed 10 places with the help of a 25-point increase in its associate satisfaction score (now 93), and an increase in diversity by 8.5 points. While the firm did see decreases in the female equity partners and pro bono categories, it still managed to finish in 34th.
34. White & Case (tie). White & Case moved up four places to tie for 34th this year. The firm kept its perfect score in diversity and improved its scores in all other categories. However, its female equity partners score only improved to 35.5 points, giving the firm room to improve.
36. Willkie Farr & Gallagher. Willkie dropped 10 places to 36th. The firm experienced a decline in multiple categories, including a 12-point drop in associate satisfaction (now 73.5) and a six-point fall in diversity. But Willkie did see small improvements in its RPL and pro bono scores.
37. Sullivan & Cromwell. Despite a nearly perfect score in the RPL category (99.5), Sullivan & Cromwell dropped 13 spots to place 37th. The firm's associate satisfaction score dropped by 13.5 points (now 50), along with its diversity score falling by five points.
38. Hogan Lovells. Hogan Lovells was able to improve its associate satisfaction score by 13.5 points, but that did not stop the firm from dropping by two spots in this year's rankings. The firm saw a minor improvement in RPL, but its scores dropped in diversity, female equity partners and pro bono.
39. Weil, Gotshal & Manges. Weil dropped by 10 spots this year from 29th to place 39th. Even though the firm saw a minor increase in its RPL score, every other category saw a decrease, including a 9.5-point drop in female equity partners (now 51).
40. Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson (tie). Fried Frank moved up by two spots this year from 42nd. The firm saw declines in associate satisfaction and pro bono, but offset those weaknesses with a strong RPL score and an eight-point increase in diversity.
40. Goodwin Procter (tie). Goodwin Procter jumped five spots to tie for the last place on our runners-up list. Despite declines in female equity partners and pro bono, the firm saw multiple improvements, including a 16-point increase in associate satisfaction and an increase in diversity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 23
- 4Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 5The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250