Ex-Partner Hits Stoel Rives With Age Bias Suit
Roger Rosendahl, who was 73 when he joined Stoel Rives as a partner, has accused the firm of pushing him out because of his age and thwarting him from doing substantive work for a client he helped land.
July 26, 2018 at 03:47 PM
4 minute read
A former Stoel Rives project finance partner has sued the firm in Washington, D.C., alleging it pushed him out because of his age, failed to give him proper credit for landing a major client matter and undermined his attempts to find a new professional home.
Roger Rosendahl, now listed as a partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough's New York office, lodged age discrimination and other allegations against his former firm. Rosendahl, representing himself, initially filed the Stoel Rives suit in December in D.C. superior court, but it was removed on Wednesday to D.C. federal court. Stoel Rives, an Am Law 200 firm based in Portland, Oregon, is being defended by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.
In his complaint, Rosendahl seeks a judgment of at least $30 million and accuses Stoel Rives and several former colleagues, including Mark Morford, a special counsel focused on environmental law, and Bradley Tellam, who serves as firm counsel and chief operating officer, of age bias. The suit alleges that Rosendahl joined Stoel Rives from DLA Piper in 2014, at age 73.
Rosendahl wasn't asked how old he was when he was hired and didn't volunteer the information, he said. But his age eventually became known within Stoel Rives, and he was then allegedly subjected to mocking comments and suggestions that his title be changed to “partner emeritus” because he was an older lawyer. Rosendahl went on to allege that the firm benefited from his expertise, even as it steered work away from him and stopped bringing him to client pitches.
“Upon discovery of plaintiff's age, the firm increasingly excluded plaintiff from key work that plaintiff had developed for the firm and … reassigned plaintiff's work, credit, and responsibility to younger partners,” Rosendahl wrote in his complaint. “The firm otherwise isolated, disparaged, and harassed plaintiff, creating an increasingly hostile work environment.”
In December, Rosendahl wrote, he was called into a meeting and informed that he was being immediately terminated by Stoel Rives and removed from the firm's website. The termination came after Rosendahl raised “outspoken objections” to his treatment within the firm.
Rosendahl also alleged that in the lead-up to his termination, Stoel Rives contacted Andrews Kurth. It's not clear from Rosendahl's complaint what Stoel Rives allegedly told Andrews Kurth about Rosendahl, but he accused Stoel Rives of undermining his chances of joining that firm. Andrews Kurth would have been a natural landing spot, Rosendahl said, because his former longtime associate George Pavlenishvili had recently joined that firm, now known as Hunton Andrews Kurth, as a partner.
Grace Speights, a Morgan Lewis partner on the defense team, declined to comment on the case. A media contact at Stoel Rives did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Rosendahl also brought claims of fraud and alleged that the firm conspired to deprive him of proper credit for a major project finance representation of Northwest Innovation Works, a multinational partnership that is developing methanol production plants at sites in Oregon and Washington State. Rosendahl said he played a key role in helping Stoel Rives secure that work, which included several multibillion-dollar projects that he describes as, “the largest series of project finance transactions in the firm's history.”
But after bringing in the client, Rosendahl alleged that he was thwarted from doing substantive work on the financing as Stoel Rives assigned duties to other, younger partners instead. Rosendahl said that the Northwest Innovation project finance could bring in premiums of up to $35 million for Stoel Rives on closing.
“Plaintiff had landed a 'whale' and the firm took it and then asked 'where is your whale?'” Rosendahl wrote in his complaint.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
- 2Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 3'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250