In the six months since the U.S. Department of Justice lawyers issued guidance that drew widespread attention from the whistleblower bar, lawyers on both sides of the qui tam arena differ significantly about the consequences of the so-called Brand and Granston memos.
One thing they do agree on, however, is that the memos are showing up in court cases when defendants introduce them to bolster their arguments. Plaintiffs lawyers claim the memos are helping corporate defendants in court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
