Women Exit Ogletree Deakins in Wake of Gender Bias Allegations
“A lot of my good friends had left. I looked around and said, 'Why am I still here?'” said a former nonequity partner at Ogletree Deakins, a national labor and employment firm facing a $300 million gender bias suit.
July 31, 2018 at 05:39 PM
8 minute read
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, a national labor and employment firm facing a $300 million gender bias suit, has watched several women partners head for the doors this year. The firm, however, is taking steps to address diversity and inclusion issues.
Gillian Yee, a former nonequity partner at Ogletree Deakins, recently jumped to national labor and employment rival Jackson Lewis in Detroit. With her departure, Yee joined a growing queue of women lawyers who have left Ogletree Deakins since January, when fellow former nonequity partner Dawn Knepper hit the firm with a proposed collective action alleging gender bias.
The suit, which came a little more than a month before Knepper joined Buchalter in Irvine, California, initially saw Knepper as the sole plaintiff. But in May, three other former Ogletree Deakins nonequity partners—Jocelyn Campanaro and Angelica Ochoa from Fisher & Phillips in Denver, as well as Lillard Wise Szygenda's Alicia Voltmer in Dallas—joined the case as named plaintiffs. In late June, Tracy Warren, a former Ogletree Deakins equity partner who like Knepper joined Buchalter in Southern California earlier this year, also sought to join the suit.
According to ALM Legal Intelligence, 10 women who held a partner-level role at Ogletree Deakins—the firm uses the title “shareholder” to identify partners—have left the 759-lawyer firm since January. That's a little more than half of the 19 partners in total that have left so far this year, according to ALI. (During that time, Ogletree Deakins also added female partners Lisa Hamasaki in San Francisco and Cécile Martin in Paris.)
In February, Pryor Cashman and Polsinelli picked up immigration experts Maria Gandarez and Sarah Hawk in New York and Atlanta, respectively, while labor and employment litigator Cheryl Schreck joined Fisher & Phillips in Los Angeles. Barnes & Thornburg added Ogletree Deakins partners Dawn Collins and Tae Kim for its Los Angeles office in March. Other Ogletree Deakins partners on the move this year include Dinah Choi, now corporate counsel for global health and safety at Amazon Web Services LLC in Portland, Oregon, and Sarah Nichols, who has set up her own shop in San Francisco.
Yee, who before joining Jackson Lewis last week had worked at Ogletree Deakins for the past decade, declined to discuss the gender bias litigation targeting her former firm.
“Let's talk about Jackson Lewis. It's innovative, progressive and has all sorts of different ways for attorneys to thrive in their practice,” she said. ”There is a commitment to diversity here that I share.”
David Sanford of Sanford Heisler Sharp, a veteran litigator in taking on Big Law, represents plaintiffs in the gender bias litigation against Ogletree Deakins. He said his firm has often been retained for gender bias suits against large law firms, including some that have settled. (Chadbourne & Parke, now part of Norton Rose Fulbright, settled earlier this year a gender bias case filed by three former partners represented by Sanford.)
The women who have left Ogletree Deakins' partnership this year either did not return requests for comment or declined to be identified by name for this story when discussing their former firm.
“A lot of my good friends had left. I looked around and said, 'Why am I still here?'” one woman, a former nonequity partner at Ogletree Deakins, told The American Lawyer.
In their amended complaint filed in May, the plaintiffs suing Ogletree Deakins claim that women lawyers at the firm “face discrimination in pay, promotions and other unequal opportunities in the terms and conditions of their employment.”
The suit against Ogletree Deakins, one of several cases now shining a spotlight on Big Law compensation practices, also accuses it of being a place where male partners are “disproportionately over-represented at every level of the firm's management and leadership structure.” Those allegedly dominant male decision-makers, according to the complaint, deny female partners the same business development and training opportunities afforded to their male colleagues.
”Through formal policies and widespread practices, the firm's male leadership interferes with, limits, or prevents female shareholders from receiving the appropriate credit for the business they bring to the firm and their hard work in running complex and demanding cases day-to-day. All the while, their male colleagues reap the professional and financial profits that women generate,” states the suit filed in federal court in San Francisco. ”Female shareholders are not selected for business pitches at the same rate as similarly situated, and in some cases less qualified, male attorneys. Through these practices, the firm systematically overlooks, devalues, or undermines female attorneys as business generators, which adversely effects their pay and promotion.”
Ogletree Deakins, which is being represented by Paul Hastings in the litigation, has not yet responded in a court filing to the plaintiffs, although the firm's management has previously rejected their allegations. In a statement issued after a first amended complaint was filed, Ogletree Deakins said it would “confidently defend” itself in court and noted that it maintains a steadfast commitment to equal opportunity.
“We do not tolerate discrimination of any kind—gender or otherwise. We take the allegations filed by former shareholders very seriously,” the firm said in May. “However, the decision-making process that governs our compensation system is both fair and equitable.”
In another statement provided Tuesday evening to The American Lawyer, Ogletree Deakins said that equal opportunity has been a core principle of the firm since its founding in 1977.
“We do not tolerate discrimination of any kind—gender or otherwise,” the firm said. “The decision-making process that governs our compensation system is fair, equitable and fully transparent. Under our 'open compensation' system, all shareholders in the firm know what every other shareholder earns—and the factors that support those determinations. In fact, allegations of pay discrimination are disproven by a recent compensation analysis conducted by a prominent labor economist, who found that for both equity and nonequity shareholders nationwide, gender had no impact on compensation.”
Ogletree Deakins also noted that it has three women on its nine-member board, as well as two women on its four-partner compensation committee. The firm said that women comprise more than half of the people in its ranks, and that during the past four years, the majority of lawyers promoted to partner have been women. Ogletree Deakins said that of the 11 individuals it elevated to partner in January, eight were women. Half of those elected to equity partner, the firm said, were also women.
As part of its efforts to promote equity, Ogletree Deakins recently formed a task force to study issues related to the advancement and recognition of women at the firm. Based on that task force's recommendations, Ogletree Deakins' board has adopted a number of initiatives to tweak its credit guidelines, pay equity and extended leave and flexible work policies. Those measures have included Ogletree Deakins appointing two individuals—a senior female partner and a former member of the board—to assist the firm in resolving workplace issues and create a positive work environment for diversity and inclusion.
Ogletree Deakins also noted several recent accolades it has received, including a ranking of No. 12 on sibling publication The National Law Journal's 2018 Women's Scorecard, as well as a top two ranking in the 600-lawyer category for Law360's 2018 Glass Ceiling Report. Just this month, Ogletree Deakins said it was recognized as a “Gold Standard” firm for leadership roles achieved by equity women partners by the Women in Law Empowerment Forum, the third time the firm has received the honor.
The American Lawyer, in its recently published A-List rankings, identified Ogletree Deakins as the 71st large firm in the nation based on its percentage of female equity partners. At the firm, which earlier this month hired a new head of its electronic discovery and records release practice and launched an M&A practice, 18.9 percent of 181 equity participants are female.
UPDATE: 7/31/18, 10:38 p.m. EDT. A statement and other information from Ogletree Deakins has been added to the final six paragraphs of this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Glynn County Judge Rejects Ex-DA's Motion to Halt Her Misconduct Trial in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
- 2Pa 100: Largest Law Firms
- 3Whistleblowers Are Here To Stay: Counseling Corporate Clients on Whistleblower Programs
- 4Intentionally Caused Motor Vehicle Accidents In the Video Spotlight
- 5Scrap the State's Taxpayer Funding of Elections
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250