Women Partners, Law Firm Leaders Have Vastly Different Big Law Lives, Study Shows
A new American Bar Association analysis shows that men and women experience life at large law firms vastly differently. The data underscores what the ABA hopes will be the first step toward changing that.
August 03, 2018 at 06:20 PM
5 minute read
If you ask women partners, law firm life is not all it's cracked up to be. If you ask managing partners, things are going just fine for women in Big Law.
That's one large takeaway from a study commissioned by the American Bar Association that was aimed at making recommendations on how to stem a “gigantic talent drain” as women leave the legal profession much more quickly and in larger numbers than men. A study of lawyers at Am Law 200 firms by ALM Legal Intelligence shows that while 44 percent of 2015 graduates are women, a mere quarter of graduates from 1991 are women.
The results of the study, which included more than 1,300 participants from the nation's 350 largest law firms, were partially released Friday at an event at the ABA annual meeting in Chicago. The survey's most stark divisions between men and women had to do with how the two groups experienced harassment and gender bias. But they also generally showed a vast disconnect between female and male partners, and specifically women and managing partners, about their experiences in Big Law.
Nearly half of women—49 percent—reported receiving unwanted sexual conduct or contact. For men, that number was just 6 percent. Nearly three-fourths of women—or 74 percent—had experienced demeaning communications, while only 8 percent of their male colleagues reported the same. Eighty-one percent of women had been mistaken for a lower-level employee; zero percent of men said that happened to them.
More than half of women, 54 percent, said they had been denied a salary increase or bonus. Four percent of men said that happened to them. And 51 percent of women said they had felt “treated as a token,” while only 1 percent of men said they had ever felt that way.
As for the difference between women partners' and managing partners' experiences in Big Law, 80 percent of managing partners said that law firm leaders were “active advocates” for advancing women within firms; 61 percent of women agreed. Three-fourths of managing partners said firms promote women into leadership positions; 54 percent of women agreed. Seventy-nine percent of leaders said gender diversity is a priority at their firm; 54 percent of women agreed.
As for promoting women into equity partnerships, 71 percent of firm leaders agreed firms were doing a good job. Among women, the number was 47 percent.
The survey was commissioned by ABA president Hilarie Bass, who is co-president of Greenberg Traurig and has spent more than 25 years in Big Law.
“The longer I do this, the more frustrated I have become that we continue to have to ask these same questions: Why are there so few women who make it to the level of equity partner? Why are there so few women on compensation committees? Why are there so few women managing partners?” Bass said Friday. “It really begs the question of what we need to do to have more women in these upper levels, if in fact almost half of women have left by the time they're 50.”
Toward answering that question—why women leave their firms—the survey asked about men and women's general level of satisfaction within Big Law.
Compensation was a large point of divergence: 69 percent of male partners were satisfied with the firm's compensation methods, compared to 44 percent of women. While 71 percent of men said they were satisfied with the recognition they received for their work, 50 percent of women agreed.
The survey also asked lawyers with more than 20 years of experience about aspects of men and women's lives outside of Big Law. The survey found stark differences on that score as well.
For instance, 54 percent of women had responsibilities for arranging child care, compared to 1 percent of men. Forty-two percent of women reported having responsibility to do laundry, compared to 8 percent of men. While 34 percent of women reported they often leave work for their children's needs, only 5 percent of men said they did the same.
The survey is meant to be a springboard for recommendations that Bass hopes will at some point be brought to the ABA House of Delegates to encourage law firms to take active steps to retain senior women partners.
Those steps have not been formally agreed upon yet, but Stephanie Scharf, a former Jenner & Block and Kirkland & Ellis partner who is now a name partner at Chicago's Scharf Banks Marmor, said many of the suggestions will be aimed at changing law firms. (Scharf serves as chair of the ABA Commission on Women in the Profession and took part in conducting the survey.)
“In looking at the parameters where women are much less satisfied than men, all of those factors are pretty much within the control of the law firm,” Scharf said. “We did not see differences in opinion [between men and women], for example, on the challenge of your work or the individual responsibility of your work. I underline that because I do believe this is within control of the employers.”
The official survey, which was done in conjunction with ALM Legal Intelligence, is set to be officially released around Labor Day.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Eckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250