Reed Smith Says Tech Summer Associate Program Will Return Next Year
After a successful launch, the firm said it's already seeing some "exciting" resumes for next year's legal technology summer associate program.
August 13, 2018 at 05:30 PM
3 minute read
Reed Smith tried something different this summer with its newest would-be lawyers.
In April the 1,500-lawyer firm launched what amounts to a magnet program for technology-minded summer associates—chasing an edge in two key areas: attracting strong talent and legal technology innovation.
The inaugural Legal Technology Summer Associate Program combined the traditional summer experience with projects aimed at using tech to improve legal services. To hear Reed Smith tell it, the experiment was a big success.
“We're very pleased with the input, the results and the collaboration,” said Reed Smith's director of practice innovation, David Pulice.
As more and more lawyers graduate from law schools already acclimated to using technology in the practice of law, Reed Smith decided to mix the work of a traditional summer associate with the opportunity to innovate, Pulice said.
The five associates selected for the program worked alongside Reed Smith attorneys in Chicago, London and Pittsburgh to develop ideas to enhance collaboration and efficiency across the firm and provide new solutions to clients.
“The summer exceeded my expectations,” said Danielle Chirdon, a second-year law student from Michigan State University College of Law.
“I really appreciated the level of responsibility I was given, and I left this summer feeling energized about working with the firm in the future,” she said, noting that she accepted a position as a first-year associate in 2019.
Chirdon, who was based in the firm's Chicago office, worked on several projects over the summer, including one focused on document automation. That project required assessing how the firm could leverage its technology and then creating a visualization of how the automation process would work.
“We [also focused] in on the user experience, and how this could best work in terms of solving a problem,” Chirdon said. Key considerations included “making it more efficient, making it so the client wants to use the product, as well as making sure that it was going to also help efficiency at Reed Smith so we can deliver what the client wants better, faster, and cheaper,” she said.
Another participant, University of Pittsburgh School of Law student Tyler Siminski, worked on a project involving a Reed Smith banking client, Pulice said. Siminski helped create a data analytics site through Reed Smith's extranet portal, according to Pulice, allowing the client to spot trends in bankruptcy litigation matters.
“[The summer associates] really recognized the need for something that we tout all the time—having the right people invoking the right process and then marrying that with technology,” Pulice said.
“It wasn't all theoretical and academic. It was much more practical than what I anticipated, which was a huge benefit for us,” he added.
According to Reed Smith chief knowledge officer Lucy Dillon, the firm will most definitely implement the program next year.
“It has been approved and we are already seeing some exciting resumes coming through for 2019,” Dillon said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250