Prenda 'Porn Troll' Lawyer Pleads Guilty to Federal Fraud Charges
The infamous Midwest lawyers behind a nationwide porn troll copyright scheme known as Prenda Law are back together again. This time, in pleading guilty to federal fraud charges.
August 17, 2018 at 03:46 PM
4 minute read
Paul Hansmeier agreed to plead guilty to two charges related to wire fraud and money laundering on Friday, according to federal court documents that outlined the troubled Minnesota lawyer's involvement in a scheme that made more than $3 million by uploading copyrighted porn videos to the internet and then suing individuals who downloaded them.
John Steele, another member of the Prenda Law copyright campaign, pleaded guilty in March 2017 to seven counts of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. The pair were both indicted in December 2016.
Hansmeier's plea agreement stated that he and Steele began representing holders of porn movie copyrights in 2010, filing suits against IP addresses they had observed downloading adult films. The duo would then ask federal judges for early discovery to seek internet subscribers' names and contact information so they could send demand letters asking, often times, for a $3,000 settlement, according to court records.
In 2011, the pair uploaded movies to the BitTorrent website Pirate Bay, which made it easier for individuals to download the movies and easier for Prenda Law to track them, stated Hansmeier's plea agreement. He and Steele also contracted adult actresses to film their own movies, which they then uploaded onto Pirate Bay. They hid their involvement and personal stakes in the litigation from courts, according to the plea agreement.
Copyrights to the movies were held in a variety of shell companies, such as AF Holdings LLC, Guava LLC and Ingenuity 13 LLC, the agreement stated. Hansmeier and Steele also set up an entity called Under the Bridge Consulting that they used to transfer more than $1 million from the litigation to themselves, stated the agreement.
The sentencing guideline in the plea agreement stated that Hansmeier faces between 11 and 14 years in federal prison, with the charges carrying a maximum sentence of 20 years. The government also agreed not to pursue other potential crimes against Hansmeier, who is also facing an investigation into a personal bankruptcy filing.
Hansmeier will also be allowed to appeal a court's earlier decision to deny his motion to dismiss the charges. If he prevails, the government withheld the right to bring the remaining 15 charges that Hansmeier did not plead guilty to on Friday.
While Prenda has long been dormant, mass porn copyright infringement campaigns have only grown more popular.
Strike 3 Holdings, a plaintiff that owns copyrights to movies by pornography brands “Vixen,” “Tushy” and “Blacked,” has filed more than 1,500 copyright suits within the past year-and-a-half, according to data from legal analytics firm Lex Machina. In more than 1,000 of those suits the company has been represented by Fox Rothschild.
Fox Rothschild lawyers have sought to distance themselves from Prenda in court filings.
In one filing in an ongoing case in Washington state, the firm called Prenda a “big, dumb, malicious animal from years ago that unfortunately now poses the risk of trampling the rights of all the legitimate content creators, such as plaintiff, who have been forced to seek court intervention to address the tidal wave of internet infringement that puts content creators at risk of drowning in a sea of theft. The court should rest assured: plaintiff and its counsel are the anti-Prenda.”
Editor's Note: A previous version of this article mistakenly referenced a lawyer from Ciresi Conlin as having represented Hansmeier. The firm never represented Hansmeier. We regret the error.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250