Why We Looked at Wall Street Firms
Months of bread crumbs led the trail to an examination of the nation's elite firms.
August 19, 2018 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
The 10-year anniversary of Lehman Brothers' collapse this September is admittedly a good time to take a look back at the effects of 2008's financial crisis and their impact on Big Law. But to be honest, the idea to start looking specifically at what was happening with Wall Street firms started percolating before any of us noticed the calendar.
For me, story ideas come in a number of forms, but every once in a while, there will be ah-ha moments where several different bits of information from meetings with law firm leaders, general counsel and consultants, along with the pieces ALM and others write come together to turn a light bulb on. Nuggets from each conversation add up to something we just can't ignore.
To follow a conversation on this subject between ALM Intelligence senior analyst Nicholas Bruch and The American Lawyer editor-in-chief Gina Passarella beginning Aug. 28, register here:
The look at Wall Street firms specifically came from wide-ranging places: the lateral hires away from those firms; upcoming retirements of architects of many of the financial vehicles that kept those firms so busy; a shift in the types and sizes of deals we were seeing in our Dealmakers of the Year submissions; comments from general counsel that financial services work just wasn't as difficult as it once was; the rise of the private equity world and the absence of many Wall Street firms from that space; the types of litigation Wall Street firms were turning to that historically wouldn't have met muster for their business models; and the list goes on.
But with every idea, there is the potential it's a dead end. This bread crumb trail may have led to no story at all. But as Christine Simmons and I worked on what is now the cover story of The American Lawyer's September edition, it turned out the story was rich with detail. Not all bad for the Wall Street firms certainly. As the 2017 financial results show, they are still plenty able to keep the lights on. Really expensive lights. But what was increasingly clear was that things weren't as they always were. And for a group of firms that spends a lot of time going after work that can't be impacted by market fluctuations, that is a bigger deal than it may be to other subsets of firms skilled in the art of adaptation.
And perhaps that is what the story ultimately uncovered. Wall Street firms aren't at risk of shutting down—though some analysts predicted a few of them may. They aren't going to suffer enormous dips in profitability—though it's getting harder and harder to hedge against that. What Wall Street firms will have to do is adapt. They have to compete. And that is just not a position in the market they are used to facing.
Much of the shift comes from dynamics outside the firms' control. The financial services industry, particularly investment banks, has simply lost a lot of its cache and power. And for a set of firms that focused more on the banks and less on corporate America or private equity firms, that has a trickle-down effect. The wall of preeminence around 15 of the most elite firms in the world is starting to show cracks. How the firms will fill them—and many are trying—will be fodder for several stories to come.
➤ RELATED PODCAST: Are Wall Street Law Firms Losing the Talent War?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCovington, Steptoe Form New Groups Amid Demand in Regulatory, Enforcement Space
4 minute readConsumer Finance Law Enforcer Takes Private Practice Job at Morgan Lewis
With 'Fractional' C-Suite Advisers, Midsize Firms Balance Expertise With Expense
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250