Big Law Stays 'Bullish' on Small and Midsize Mergers
With three Am Law 200 firms announcing mergers this week, large firms are showing their appetites for acquiring smaller shops.
August 22, 2018 at 05:27 PM
5 minute read
There's no such thing as the summer doldrums this year for law firm mergers, as small and midsize firms continue to attract Big Law suitors.
The past two weeks alone brought news of at least six mergers involving an Am Law 200 or Global 100 firm, according to ALM reports and Altman Weil's MergerLine. A MergerLine report from earlier this summer showed that the legal industry was already on pace for another record-setting year for law firm mergers, with 51 combinations taking place in the first half.
Altman Weil consultant Eric Seeger said if inquiries by law firms are any indication, many more combinations are likely in the works.
“The firms that have seen consistently positive results are feeling bullish about growth, and have the willingness to make those investments,” Seeger said. “I can't remember a time when so many firms were calling us to find a firm to acquire, or to discuss a merger opportunity.”
On Tuesday, Washington, D.C.-based Venable announced a combination with IP firm Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, in the biggest deal of the month so far. Fitzpatrick Cella adds 104 lawyers to Venable, which will have roughly 800 attorneys once the merger becomes official in November.
In the same day, Holland & Knight announced that it had acquired a six-lawyer international tax boutique based in Tampa, Sharp Partners.
On Monday, Milwaukee-based firm Michael Best & Friedrich added seven lawyers in Colorado through a merger with small firm Modus Law, which works with startup companies.
And last week, Kansas City-based Stinson Leonard Street announced plans to bulk up its presence in St. Louis in its second acquisition since the spring, with 24-lawyer intellectual property firm Senniger Powers.
Also last week, global firm Dentons picked up a 33-lawyer firm in Chile, and Squire Patton Boggs absorbed small IP shop Singularity in Northern California.
For Am Law 200 firms, small and midsize combination partners usually offer one of three things, said Barry Genkin, an M&A lawyer at Blank Rome: a geographic foothold, deep strength in a new practice area or added capabilities in an existing, key practice area. Often the smaller of two merging firms is looking for a way to keep its most successful partners, who may be looking to take their practices to a larger platform, he said.
“They're certainly not desperate, but they know the clock is ticking, and the longer they wait the harder it's going to be to find a [merger] partner that's compatible,” Genkin said. “You don't want to do something like that when you're under the gun.”
As for the smaller mergers of 10 lawyers or fewer, those are often akin to a group lateral partner hire in investment and impact on firm head count, but with a greater chance of success, said Frank D'Amore of Attorney Career Catalysts in Philadelphia.
“If you can bring a group, it's a bit stronger sign that the clients are going to come,” he said. “If you're able to get a firm, and you're able to lock in the key partners, it takes the client flight risk almost away, because you're getting the whole firm.”
Simply watching other combinations take place has been enough to make some firms take the plunge, D'Amore said. “Earlier in my recruiting career I had to do much more of an educational process” with firms that should consider a merger, he said. But now, firm leaders are more aware of the possibilities, because so many of their peers are making those moves.
Seeger echoed that sentiment, and said Altman Weil gets inquiries from firms that see their market being “stirred up.” As they watch neighbors merge, they're open to exploring opportunities for themselves, he said.
Meanwhile, pressures on certain niche practices can also drive movement. For instance, a number of this year's mergers have involved IP boutiques, including three of the most recently acquired firms—Fitzpatrick Cella, Senniger Powers and Singularity.
“I've heard from other IP firms that patent prosecution has been undergoing commoditization for years,” Seeger said. That places pressures on IP boutique profit margins, he said. But some large firms are willing to take on that less profitable group for the cross-selling opportunities.
That may be the case for other practice areas as well, Seeger said, such as employment law. However, he noted, there are plenty of highly profitable boutiques that merge with larger firms as well.
“Sophisticated niche expertise is valuable to large firms,” he said, “and to clients.”
READ MORE:
Firm Mergers Near Record Pace at Midyear Point
Venable Adds 100 Lawyers in Merger With New York's Fitzpatrick Cella
Holland & Knight Tacks on International Tax Boutique, Ex-Deloitte Leader
Michael Best Taps Into the Rockies With 7-Lawyer Law Firm Merger
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250