The Simple Ways Law Firms Can Make Associates Happier
Midlevels associates are an eager but insecure group. So may I suggest you use those attributes to your benefit?
August 26, 2018 at 06:00 PM
5 minute read
Dear Managing Partners:
Fabulous news. You don't have to do anything radical (or spend much money) to satisfy the troops. Based on the results of The American Lawyer's Midlevel Associates Survey, these associates are inexplicably content. They gave their experience a 4.27 score on a 5-point scale, even though they are billing more than ever. How awesome is that?
In fact, they're respectful of the status quo. Some even answered “nothing” to the question, “What would you change about your firm?” And isn't it incredible that some midlevels wanted to say “thank you” or “keep doing what you're doing” when asked what they'd like to tell the managing partner of their firm?
Of course, there were the complainers—ones who railed about the tyranny of the billable hour, the lack of autonomy and the dearth of information about partnership prospects. Then, there were the idealists who seemed insistent that work-life balance should be a priority in Big Law. Lest balance is addressed, warns one Latham & Watkins associate, the firm will be “left with emotionally less mature individuals who are not well-rounded in life experiences.” (Question: Are mature, well-rounded people really prized commodities at law firms?)
Yet, after sifting through the associates' comments, I'm quite sure you don't have to take the gripes too seriously. These midlevels are an eager, self-impressed but deeply insecure group. So may I suggest you use those attributes to your benefit?
Here are my suggestions to keep associates exactly where you want them without draining your coffers:
Be nice. And send your partners to charm school, if necessary. It's remarkable how little associates expect from their law firm experience. When asked what they found “surprising” about their jobs, associates often answered, “the collegiality,” “how nice everyone is” or “how normal people seem”—as if working with polite, pleasant people was an unexpected perk. Moreover, associates are easily endeared by common decencies. One associate complimented his firm for being “accommodating … when it comes to the 'big' life issues (death of loved ones, etc.).”
Imagine how your firm's score would soar if your firm showed just a smidgen of compassion and your partners actually uttered “please” or “thank you” once in a blue moon.
Whisper some sweet nothings to them. Though associates are clamoring for more clarity in their prospects for making partner, you know you're not going to give them meaningful direction on this score. But if you need them to stay put for your selfish reasons, at least give some encouragement. “Partners should explicitly say they want associates to stay,” says an Arnold & Porter associate.
I know lawyers tend to be repressed, but partners need to show associates a little love. Is it that hard?
Give them little treats—literally. It's not a major complaint, but it's notable. “Improve coffee and beverage selections, make snacks available,” implored a Greenberg Traurig associate. “Better doughnuts on Friday!” wrote a Kirkland & Ellis associate. ”Please give us free, healthy food,” pleaded a Manatt, Phelps & Phillips associate.
Yes, associates making six figures can afford to buy their own munchies. But that's not the point. Associates like little tokens of appreciation. And supplying some high-quality snacks won't break the bank.
Let them bill in their pajamas. A recurring complaint is the lack of flexible work arrangements at some firms. You might think that showing up is good for esprit de corps, but that is so 2006. A Vinson & Elkins associate pleaded to work remotely just one to two days a week: “We would be just as productive but much happier! It would also make national news and be great press showing that V&E is trying to cater to millennials.”
If associates can bill 2,500 hours a year lying on their futons all day, what do you care?
Throw in something trendy. If you insist that associates toil away at the office, at least give them an aesthetic environment. You don't have to hire Gwathmey Siegel to redo the entire office, but at least give them a nice workspace. “My desk is getting old, let's get some electric standing desks,” pleaded a Winston & Strawn associate in Chicago. (That office must be getting shabby because another Winston associate said: “I would like new furniture.”)
Remember, upgrading furniture is much cheaper than giving associates fat bonuses.
More cocktail parties! Maybe it's because we're all social beings. Or maybe it's because it's hard for busy lawyers to make friends outside their firms. For whatever reason, the dearth of socializing opportunities was a persistent complaint.
And yes, alcohol must be served. Despite those cautionary tales about the mischief involving alcohol, facing colleagues stone sober won't cut it. Complains one Fried Frank associate: “Our holiday party should not be an alcohol-free two-hour lunch break in the middle of the workday.” Indeed.
Show them your human side. A few associates expressed the desire for more personal interaction with partners and colleagues. “Instead of a firm dinner-dance, we need a picnic or something where people can bring their families,” wrote one associate. “We need opportunities to actually get to know each other in a meaningful way.”
Imagine that: Associates actually want to get to know you on a personal level. It's almost poignant.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHSF's American Dream: What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
Trending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250