Data Snapshot: What's Average Big Law Pay for Summer Associates?
A sneak peek at the 2018 summer associate hiring survey conducted by ALM Intelligence shows some signs of rising summer associate pay.
August 27, 2018 at 05:00 AM
3 minute read
There's been a lot of hubbub lately about increases in law firm associate pay. But is there also some upward pressure on how much summer associates are raking in?
At the end of July, ALM Intelligence—a division of ALM Media—released the results of its annual summer associate hiring survey, which shows some signs of rising summer associate pay.
Among the 67 Am Law 200 and Global 100 firms that disclosed pay for both the 2017 and 2018 surveys, the average weekly salary inched up from $3,308 in 2017 to $3,322 in 2018. But five firms increased pay by more than 5 percent year-on-year: Nixon Peabody, Dorsey & Whitney, Faegre Baker Daniels, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, and Duane Morris.
Nixon Peabody, for instance, upped its pay by more than 40 percent to $3,462, according to the survey. Now, keep in mind this figure is for weekly pay, and it's the average for the firm as well. That means, in theory, that a few well-paid summer associates could skew the results.
Some additional context is also helpful. The firms listed above reported relatively smaller summer associate class sizes. That suggests it may be hard to extrapolate much from those increases.
If we look at the full slate of respondents in 2018, the biggest class sizes are at the firms you might expect: Latham & Watkins (204 summer associates); Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (203); and Davis Polk & Wardell (179).
By comparison, Nixon Peabody reported just 13 summer associates in its class this year; Dorsey & Whitney had 25; and Faegre Baker had 46. OK, so maybe there's not a trend after all?
But take a look at the graph below, which compares 55 firms that have given summer associate pay over the past three years – 2016, 2017, and 2018. It indicates that the pay spread is narrowing and converging at a higher figure—even if the overall maximum hasn't increased.
The annual ALM Intelligence Summer Hiring Survey polls all firms in the AmLaw 200 and a select number of Global 100 firms; for 2018, 91 firms provided hiring and pay data. Stay tuned for additional analysis in the October issue of The American Lawyer or obtain the full dataset from ALM Intelligence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeet the Finalists: The American Lawyer's Young Lawyers of The Year
A Law Firm Divided: How Generational Differences Are Fracturing Firms
The Week in Data Aug. 6: A Look at Legal Industry Trends By the Numbers
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250