Twin Cities Market Grows Again With New Quarles & Brady Outpost
“There's a significant amount of business here, and therefore a lot of good firms either are here or are trying to come here into this market,” partner Daniel Young said of the firm's Minneapolis move.
September 06, 2018 at 07:10 PM
3 minute read
Am Law 200 law firm Quarles & Brady announced on Wednesday the opening of its new office in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
The new Twin Cities office, located in Fifth Street Tower, will be the Milwaukee-based firm's 11th nationwide.
“Minneapolis had been on the firm's radar for some time, and basically over the last couple of years just grew into that strategic fit,” said partner Daniel Young, who will be one of the four attorneys outfitting the new office.
Young, who has been working remotely in Minnesota and in the Phoenix office since joining the firm in 2016 as a part of its business law practice group, will be joined by real estate partner Isaac Roang, who will relocate from the firm's Milwaukee office. Associates Peter Kaiser and Michael Larson are also joining the new office.
The firm has serviced Minnesota-based clients from its current locations, but decided to expand into Minneapolis as part of a broader strategic growth plan, Young said.
“The firm has strategically identified certain areas in the country where we have existing clients, significant work, a significant presence and significant opportunities,” Young said.
The Twin Cities market is both a unique business market and a unique legal market, said Young, a Minnesota native.
Nearly 20 Fortune 500 companies call Minnesota home. Thanks to this solid corporate base, Minneapolis has been one of the most active markets for law firm mergers and expansion.
Among other entrants, Cozen O'Conner set up shop in there in 2013 with eight transactional and commercial litigation partners from Hinshaw & Culbertson. Fox Rothschild entered the Minneapolis market in 2015 through a merger with Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly. Jones Day opened an office in the city in 2016 with a trio from Barnes & Thornburg.
Earlier this year, Philadelphia-based Ballard Spahr finalized its union with Minneapolis-based Lindquist & Vennum, creating a 650-lawyer firm with 15 offices.
“There's a significant amount of business here, and therefore a lot of good firms either are here or are trying to come here into this market,” Young said.
Quarles & Brady plans to ramp up its operations in Minneapolis, Young said, adding that the 461-lawyer firm has 11 attorneys admitted to practice in Minnesota.
“We're actively pursuing associates, laterals and other strategic firm fits with either boutique or other larger firms that are looking to expand their presence with our group,” Young said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250