Yup, It's Great to Be a White Male Lawyer!
As if every day wasn't enough to remind you—it's still good to be a white guy.
September 07, 2018 at 03:03 PM
4 minute read
There's no way to sugarcoat this, so let me be blunt: It sucks to be a female lawyer, but it really sucks to be a female lawyer of color. In almost every aspect—from hiring, assignments, pay, image to you-name-it—minority women face far greater obstacles than their Caucasian peers (male and female) or men of color.
That's the bleak finding of the just-released study by the American Bar Association's commission on women and the Minority Corporate Counsel Association.
It confirms that women of color get socked with a double whammy: Negative racial stereotypes plus sexism. What's more, the efforts instituted over the years to fix those problems have been largely useless.
Here's a snapshot of the cheery findings:
— Sixty-three percent of women of color report having to work harder (what the study calls the “prove-it-again” phenomenon) to get recognition and respect.
— Two-thirds of women of color (67 percent) report being held to higher standards than their colleagues. To a lesser degree, men of color and white women (58 percent and 52 percent, respectively) also feel that they are held to higher standards than white men.
— Almost 70 percent of women of color (compared to 60 percent of white women) say they were paid less than their colleagues with similar experience and seniority, while only 36 percent of white men report the same.
— Slightly more than half of women of color (53 percent) report that they had equal access to high-quality assignments compared to 81 percent of white men.
— Just over half of women of color (52 percent)—versus three-quarters of white men—believe that they have had fair opportunities for promotion.
And if all that is not discouraging enough, try this zinger: Women of color say they still get mistaken for administrative staff, court personnel and janitorial staff!
The intersection of race and gender binds the careers of women of color like no other group, said University of California, Hastings College of the Law professor Joan Williams, a prominent feminist, social scientist and legal scholar who worked on the report.
“What's important in the finding is that there's a narrower band of behavior that's expected of women and people of color, and women of color are disadvantaged the most,” Williams said. “They're expected to be worker bees who are supportive but not threatening.”
Curiously, there were a few areas in which white female lawyers actually fared worst than their minority sisters in the report. When it came to parental leave, more white women (57 percent) report negative repercussions, compared to 50 percent of women of color, 47 percent of men of color and 42 percent of white men.
Moreover, white women (59 percent) got stuck more often with office “housework” (i.e. administrative tasks) than women of color (43 percent). And, yes, men were far less likely to get saddled with such tasks (26 percent for white male lawyers and only 20 percent for male lawyers of color).
All in all, I'd say that it's still a jolly good time to be a white man in the legal profession!
But I don't want to end all of this on a completely down note. So in my next post, I'll look at the second part of the report that offers solutions to these problems.
In the meantime, go ahead, pour yourself another drink.
RELATED STORIES:
Old Problem of Legal Industry Bias Requires New Tools, Study Says
Diversity Initiative Names 'Certified' Firms for Women, Minority Leadership
This Firm Has Gender, Diversity Problems. But It Isn't Hiding Them.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250