Women Are Getting Hung Up on Housework and Leaving Law Firms
Women's law firm careers are being slowed by their second job: homemaker.
October 01, 2018 at 04:26 PM
4 minute read
Of all the reasons women quit Big Law—the old-boys' network, lack of mentors and sponsors, client development challenges and plain old sexism—there's another explanation that's far more pedestrian: housework.
Women are leading double lives—high-powered lawyers at the office, and Susie Homemaker everywhere else. According to an American Bar Association and ALM Legal Intelligence survey of 1,300 lawyers at the nation's 350 largest firms, women are bearing the lion's share of responsibilities at home:
- 54 percent of women (versus 1 percent of men) say child care is their responsibility.
- 39 percent of women (versus 11 percent of men) say they cook the meals.
- 34 percent of women (versus 5 percent of men) say they leave work for children's needs.
No surprise, then, that the survey finds that 60 percent of women cite care-taking as the reason they ditched their jobs. The shocker isn't that women do more chores than men, but how much more. (Repeat: Only 1 percent men consider child care their responsibility.)
For more than two decades women have constituted about half of the law school student population and marched in droves to elite law firms, so why are they still playing a 1950s housewife on the side?
“Even with progressive families who try to balance duties, society is against them,” says a female Am Law 100 partner who lives in New York with her husband and three kids. “It's a cultural vestige of days gone by. School teachers reach out to mothers first, as do pediatricians, nannies—you name it.”
Societal expectations explain part of the June Cleaver syndrome, but women themselves can't seem to cede their traditional turf. Often, women joke (sort of) about why they take on so much of the domestic responsibilities. “If I want to make sure something is done right—that the kids eat decently, don't wear funny clothes and that the house doesn't smell bad—I have to do it myself,” says a senior in-house counsel.
It's a phenomenon that extends to other high-achieving women. Research by LeanIn.org and McKinsey & Co. found that senior female managers are seven times more likely than men to perform home duties. And the Harvard Business Review reports that female CEOs expect little support—either at work or at home—for their careers.
So what can be done to help women before they drive themselves to exhaustion and throw in the towel? Is it the structure of domestic life that needs to be fixed? Or are workplaces still not accommodating women's lives?
“We don't need to fix the women or their families; we need to fix the firms,” says Stephanie Scharf, a leading advocate for women in law who chaired the ABA's commission on women. The key, she explains, is that employers “adjust and adapt to the reality of what many—albeit not all—women need,” such as advancement opportunities for lawyers who work part time or flextime schedules and for those who take extended leaves. “I think that many men would love to be in that kind of firm,” adds Scharf. If firms fail to adopt more creative, flexible career routes, she warns, “they will continue to be led overwhelmingly by males and lose large numbers of talented lawyers.”
I get what Scharf is saying: Keep the pressure on firms so they don't regress. That said, I wonder if women shouldn't be putting more pressure on their significant others, too. In the last decade, women have been vocal that workplaces address scheduling and parenthood issues, but why aren't they demanding more gender equality at home?
The problem, some women say, is that it's hard to sell men on the glories of “home management” (the euphemism for housework). “A home boss has enormous power,” says the New York lawyer with three kids. But it's hard to convince men, even those who aren't so focused on making money, to take the position, she says, “because the home boss doesn't get the same accolades and remuneration.”
“It's a thankless job,” she says.
All work and no glory: Now that's the kind of job women will take every time. So while men might say they're supportive of women's careers at the office, many are not doing anything close to their fair share at home.
Not to rock the boat, but isn't it high time for a rebellion at home?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected] or on Twitter @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250