Susman Godfrey to Give All Associates Unlimited Paid Parental Leave
The firm, which often has led Big Law with its generous wage and benefit plans, is now offering associates a longer paid parental leave policy that is gender-neutral.
October 02, 2018 at 02:41 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Susman Godfrey has expanded its parental leave policy for associates, providing unlimited paid parental leave to all new parents, regardless of gender or whether they gave birth or are a caregiver.
Associates can determine the length of their leave, but the hours will be annualized for bonus purposes of up to 18 weeks for women who give birth and up to 12 weeks for any associate. This means their time off will not count against them for bonus purposes. The prior policy provided up to 16 weeks for a woman who delivered a baby and up to four weeks for other parents.
The new parental leave policy follows the Houston-based trial firm's announcement in 2015 of an unlimited paid vacation policy for associates.
Susman Godfrey partner Erica Harris said the firm's partnership decided to expand the parental leave policy because the market is moving toward offering additional time for all new parents.
“There's a recognition that all parents need and want time with their children, and while the fact that you are a delivering mother adds an additional burden that justifies additional time, everybody needed more time,” Harris said.
The new policy was an “easy move” for the firm, she said. In fact, there was such broad support for the proposal among partners that they didn't even hold an official roll-call vote, Harris said.
“No one objected or spoke against it, so it was adopted by acclamation,” she said.
The firm's prior policy provided 16 weeks of paid parental leave to women who delivered a baby and four weeks to any other parent. Harris said associates could actually take a longer paid leave under the firm's unlimited vacation policy, but the new policy formalizes that opportunity as a gender-neutral parental leave policy.
Under the new policy, associates can take a longer period of time off and still get credit for the time for bonus purposes.
Susman Godfrey has often bested the legal market when it comes to associate and partner pay and benefits. In June, the firm adopted a new associate salary scale that tops the Cravath scale adopted by many Big Law firms this year. The firm also in June adopted a policy that sets the mandatory retirement policy at age 100.
Harris said the partners looked at the firm's parental leave policy after an associate pointed out to a partner that another firm had a parental leave policy that was more gender-neutral. The firm determined that it, too, wanted to adopt a policy that was gender-neutral, but also wanted to offer the most generous policy.
Other firms are indeed sweetening parent leave policies. On Monday, Dechert changed its parental leave policy to provide at least 12 weeks of paid leave for all U.S. lawyers and employees regardless of gender. The new policy provides women who give birth up to 20 weeks of paid leave.
Susman Godfrey has a total of 139 lawyers, including 48 associates, in offices in Houston, Seattle, New York and Los Angeles.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWachtell Helps Miami Dolphins Secure One of NFL’s First Private Equity Deals
3 minute read830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250